On 08/02/12 12:50, hiro wrote:
Anybody know a simple way to get a laptops device's serial number or
some other unique identifier which won''t identify all other same
models?
So far I came up with this:
( for MA in `ls /sys/bus/pci/devices/*/modalias`
do
cat "$MA";
On (24/05/10 10:02), Premysl Hruby wrote:
> Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 10:02:47 +0200
> From: Premysl Hruby
> To: d...@suckless.org
> Subject: [sic] null pointer in printf
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
>
> Hi,
>
> in sic, if you use cmd ":m something&qu
Hi,
in sic, if you use cmd ":m something" it will use null pointer as %s in
printf (in function privmsg), which is obviously bad idea (segfault or,
as in case of glibc it send unnecessary string "(null)".
For fix, see patch:
diff -r 503b48b13a77 sic.c
--- a/sic.c Tue Jul 29 19:22:08 2008 +01
On (19/05/10 12:32), pancake wrote:
> Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 12:32:06 +0200
> From: pancake
> To: dev@suckless.org
> Subject: Re: [dev] dmenu_path rewrite in C
> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
> List-Id: dev mail list
>
> in my laptop difference is between 0.4s and 0
On (19/05/10 12:11), Mate Nagy wrote:
> Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 12:11:38 +0200
> From: Mate Nagy
> To: dev mail list
> Subject: Re: [dev] dmenu_path rewrite in C
> List-Id: dev mail list
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
>
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:09:33PM +0
On (19/05/10 12:58), Elmo Todurov wrote:
> Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 12:58:16 +0300
> From: Elmo Todurov
> To: dev mail list
> Subject: Re: [dev] dmenu_path rewrite in C
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9)
> Gecko/20100330 Shredder/3.0.4
> List-Id: dev mail list
>
On (18/03/10 20:26), Martin Kopta wrote:
> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:26:32 +0100
> From: Martin Kopta
> To: dev mail list
> Subject: Re: [dev] Fwd: Thank you for your application
> List-Id: dev mail list
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
>
> What about "Suckless summer of code" then? ;-)
>
09-06-14)
>
> On Sun 24 Jan 2010 at 09:42:59 PST Premysl Hruby wrote:
> >
> >Btw, There's one issue with trying to get size of process -- shared
> >memory. To which process should it count? And how? Or count only
> >fraction for each of process using that shared me
On (24/01/10 18:35), pmarin wrote:
> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:35:31 +0100
> From: pmarin
> To: dev@suckless.org
> Subject: [dev] [OFFTOPIC] How to know the size of a process?
> List-Id: dev mail list
>
> Hi all.
> Anyone know how to know the size (kb) of a process in Linux?
> using the proc fil
On (20/01/10 10:57), anonymous wrote:
> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:57:41 +0300
> From: anonymous
> To: dev mail list
> Subject: Re: [dev] [SLOCK] is not safe
> List-Id: dev mail list
>
> > Problem here is not using exec startx or startx & exit, not using or not
> > using exec in xinitrc/xsession
On (19/01/10 12:05), Nico Golde wrote:
> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:05:07 +0100
> From: Nico Golde
> To: dev@suckless.org
> Subject: Re: [dev] [SLOCK] is not safe
> List-Id: dev mail list
> X-Mailer: netcat 1.10
>
> Hi,
> * Andres Perera [2010-01-18 22:16]:
> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 4:23 PM, a
On (17/01/10 16:02), Rob wrote:
> Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 16:02:13 +
> From: Rob
> To: dev mail list
> Subject: Re: [dev] [SLOCK] is not safe
> List-Id: dev mail list
>
> > Asside from the fact, that magic sysrq can be disabled
> Oh yeah, forgot about that
>
> > how can some one use Magic S
On (17/01/10 15:51), Rob wrote:
> Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 15:51:26 +
> From: Rob
> To: dev mail list
> Subject: Re: [dev] [SLOCK] is not safe
> List-Id: dev mail list
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm using slock and i am suprised to realize that is not safe at all!
> >
> > I launched slock in my DWM se
On (17/01/10 16:24), Gregor Best wrote:
> Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 16:24:11 +0100
> From: Gregor Best
> To: dev@suckless.org
> Subject: Re: [dev] [SLOCK] is not safe
> List-Id: dev mail list
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
>
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 04:17:16PM +0100, Julien Pecqueur wrote:
On (17/01/10 16:17), Julien Pecqueur wrote:
> Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 16:17:16 +0100
> From: Julien Pecqueur
> To: dev@suckless.org
> Subject: [dev] [SLOCK] is not safe
> List-Id: dev mail list
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm using slock and i am suprised to realize that
On (03/01/10 19:20), Julien Pecqueur wrote:
> Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 19:20:53 +0100
> From: Julien Pecqueur
> To: dev@suckless.org
> Subject: [dev] [DWM] suggestion for dwm
> List-Id: dev mail list
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
>
> Hi,
>
> First, i wish you a happy new year :)
>
> I ha
On (23/11/09 20:47), sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:47:48 +0100
> From: sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de
> To: dev mail list
> Subject: [dev] [OT] Bcc disaster: Bcc headers not stripped
> List-Id: dev mail list
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
>
> Hi guys,
>
> just sharin
On (06/10/09 18:24), pancake wrote:
> Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:24:14 +0200
> From: pancake
> To: dev mail list
> Subject: Re: [dev] Suckless mail client solution?
> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608)
> List-Id: dev mail list
>
> I already wrote a patch for msmtp that checks for t
On (05/10/09 12:32), Daniel Bainton wrote:
> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 12:32:48 +0300
> From: Daniel Bainton
> To: dev mail list
> Subject: Re: [dev] Doubled messages.
> List-Id: dev mail list
>
> 2009/10/5 Antoni Grzymala :
> > Kris Maglione dixit (2009-10-04, 21:43):
> >
> >> On Mon, Oct 05, 2009
On (18/08/09 13:31), pancake wrote:
> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:31:59 +0200
> From: pancake
> To: dev mail list
> Subject: Re: [dev] Lexers and parsers
> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608)
> List-Id: dev mail list
>
> What about implementing a suckless forth? retroforth is minimal,
On (12/08/09 20:39), Julien Steinhauser wrote:
> Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:39:41 +0200
> From: Julien Steinhauser
> To: dev@suckless.org
> Subject: [dev] dmenu : auto confirm when only one item remains
> User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090701)
> List-Id: dev mail list
>
> Hello,
On (12/08/09 22:14), Neale Pickett wrote:
> Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:14:47 -0600
> From: Neale Pickett
> To: dev mail list
> Subject: Re: [dev] [PATCH] dwm -- Proper SIGCHLD usage , fix issue with
> uncollected processes
> List-Id: dev mail list
>
> Premysl 'Anydot' Hruby writes:
>
> > This
On (12/08/09 17:24), Jukka Salmi wrote:
> Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:24:24 +0200
> From: Jukka Salmi
> To: dev@suckless.org
> Subject: Re: [dev] [PATCH] dwm -- Proper SIGCHLD usage , fix issue with
> uncollected processes
> List-Id: dev mail list
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-20)
>
> Premys
On (22/07/09 10:30), Donald Allen wrote:
> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:30:34 -0400
> From: Donald Allen
> To: dev mail list
> Subject: [dev] dwm default bindings
> List-Id: dev mail list
>
> I think the default key bindings for dwm are a unfortunate in some
> cases. For example, alt-f, a natural
On (21/06/09 08:39), Randy Morris wrote:
> To: dev mail list
> From: Randy Morris
> Subject: Re: [dev] unsubscribe
> Reply-To: dev mail list
> List-Id: dev mail list
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
>
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 03:22:56PM +1100, Roman Belikin wrote:
> > I would be happy t
On (12/06/09 12:15), Daniel Bainton wrote:
> To: dev mail list
> From: Daniel Bainton
> Subject: Re: [dev] last request for a dev-only list
> Reply-To: dev mail list
> List-Id: dev mail list
>
> But people are idiots, they don't know how to format the subject clearly.
>
Then you have problem
On (24/05/09 23:30), bill lam wrote:
> To: dev@suckless.org
> From: bill lam
> Subject: Re: [dev] dwm only?
> Mail-Followup-To: dev@suckless.org
> Reply-To: dev mail list
> List-Id: dev mail list
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-04-29)
>
> On Sun, 24 May 2009, pmarin wrote:
> > The problem, I th
On (22/05/09 11:22), James PIC wrote:
> Got it.
> Apparently, the ML is working very fine, thanks a lot !
> Maybe there isn't any need for more tests?
>
> Cheers, James
>
Read his To: header. He didn't send test, just wanted to unsubscribe
(but with old adress). Now, this issue should be fixed,
--
Premysl "Anydot" Hruby, http://www.redrum.cz/
-
I'm a signature virus. Please add me to your signature and help me spread!
--
Premysl "Anydot" Hruby, http://www.redrum.cz/
-
I'm a signature virus. Please add me to your signature and help me spread!
30 matches
Mail list logo
