On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 19:18:50 -0700, Jessta wrote:
On 19/09/2009, Pinocchio wrote:
Take a look at "traits", a somewhat new programming language construct
recently introduced in Scala.
http://scg.unibe.ch/research/traits
Its pretty orthogonal to OO and seems to be a good alte
the new problems they create as aptly pointed out by
parent)?
Cheers,
--
Pinocchio
time and experience with the construct would
tell how much of an improvement it really is.
--
Pinocchio
e enjoyable
because that interface is a well established standard and doesn't evolve as most other software.
Think about all the changes you might have to make in Unix tools once you change something subtle
(blocking / signaling semantics) in the stdin/stdout "interface".
--
Pinocchio
client windows?
--
Pinocchio
be interesting to generalize this (automatically, of course) to a wm.
--
Pinocchio
academia focuses on typing constructs when at the
same time the industry seems to be favoring scripting languages and "duck"
typing for productivity. What do you think?
--
Pinocchio
... there are quite a few to choose from.
It would be really nice if we could make it scripting language independent. People should
have a choice to use Lua, Neko, Io or whatever they like to build a "webapp"
and access the core runtime (through IPC).
--
Pinocchio
On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 04:54:30 -0700, frederic wrote:
On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:06:20 +0200, Anselm R Garbe
wrote:
2009/9/9 Pinocchio :
I am saying this because even after a lot of marketing muscle and
commercial force, it has been hard for Adobe, Sun and Microsoft to
push
their rendering
and
pretty expressive as a language. There is also io (iolanguage.com) which I
found to be small and expressive. It would be nice if there was a neat way of
making it frontend independent. I was thinking about it more from a secure code
execution + graphics runtime perspective.
--
Pinocchio
On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 19:08:23 -0700, Uriel wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:13 AM, Pinocchio wrote:
On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 03:26:05 -0700, frederic wrote:
On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 11:51:46 +0200, Uriel wrote:
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Pinocchio wrote:
A few months ago lobobrowser.org
On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 03:26:05 -0700, frederic wrote:
On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 11:51:46 +0200, Uriel wrote:
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Pinocchio wrote:
A few months ago lobobrowser.org caught my eye. Its a browser written in
java (hold on... don't kick me off the list... :) ) but the th
uld try and
write something simpler and just write tools to directly render it for suckless browsers
or convert it to HTML + Javascript for non-suckless mortals :)
--
Pinocchio
e, I believe that giving applications more control rather than
relying on distributions to package things well would be a good first
step towards a suckless (less bloat, works out of the box) workstation /
server setup
regards,
pinocchio
14 matches
Mail list logo
