> did you try enabling the "Elevated" mode in the client (should be
> selectable at the bottom of the main window)?
Nope, because it's not a Windows machine, both machines are Linux.
I did however get a chance to do a little debugging, although I wasn't
about to learn much. I discovered that when
> You can do some testing with xclip[0] which allows you to manipulate
> the clipboard and also see requests made to xclip from X to see
> what's going on. If run with the -quiet flag it will stay in the
> foreground and notify you of every request it gets. That way you can
> see if the clipboard s
Hi everybody,
I started using st at work on my work computers. At work we all use
linux boxes supplied by the company and we don't get full control over
them. I love st, I think it is by far the nicest terminal emulator
available, however, I needed scroll back and copy paste support to
play nice w
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
> I heard about GNU GPL version wars, was only aware of the benign
> Linus T. one.
>
> Let me laught:
> Do you really think a GNU GPL version war can reasonnably
> compensate the defect of code closing from MIT/BSD-like licenses.
> I'm not w
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
> It did not get to me (I'm an internet children, I'm used to
> trolls).
> On those later threads, I stayed polite and analytical all the
> time except, of course, regarding closed source system software
> manufacturers. Could you pinpoint
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
>
> I'm very disappointed: I was the guy who was attacked on his
> published work on internet (in a rather clumsy and harsh way).
It's the internet, people say stuff, don't let it get to you.
> Nethertheless, when I'm about to get a very i
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> I am confused. The BSD 3-Clause License[0] states the following:
>
> "Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:"
>
> Specifically in
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 5:30 AM, Kurt Van Dijck
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 03:21:01AM +0900, Philip Rushik wrote:
>> > The GPL inforces that the codebase stays free.
>>
>> No, all free licenses enforce a continually free codebase. If I
>> release under MIT or
> You have cause and effect written incorrectly. Free software existed
> first, then licenses were created afterward to protect them.
Ok, well then in popularized or spread "free" software. My point was
just that "has done good" doesn't justify its continued use, and
doesn't make it suckless. That
> The GPL inforces that the codebase stays free.
No, all free licenses enforce a continually free codebase. If I
release under MIT or BSD, that code that I release will always be free
and there's nothing anybody else can do about it.
GPL tries to control what other people do with code they wrote.
10 matches
Mail list logo
