On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 08:09:12AM -0500, LM wrote:
Dear Laura,
> Very nice and definitely better than just using an ordinary shell script.
Calling other programs to determine and report a target's dependencies, is
convenient, efficient and not limited by any pattern description language.
This
Thank you all for your answers.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 06:38:01PM +0100, Страхиња Радић wrote:
> apenwarr/redo is the implementation of djb redo I settled on for my programs.
> It
> has the most features among the current implementations.
I'm glad to hear that. But it doesn't implement the less
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 09:34:52AM -0500, LM wrote:
Dear Laura,
> This looks like a very interesting project. I've been looking for some
> alternatives to GNU make.
I hope you find something to fit your needs.
> I do use a few GNU make features that I'm not sure about porting to other
> alterna
Hello, I hope you all are doing well.
Some time ago, I was using redo for building a C project, but redo, unlike make
is
non-standard, so one needed a redo implementation to build the project. At the
time, redo implementations where either written in Python,Go or had annoying
bugs
like creating
