On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Ryan O’Hara wrote:
> Jekyll seems pretty decent to me. What is there to object to? Markdown and
> Ruby?
>
> The rest of the things you mention don’t have much to do with offline
> website generation. They’re just languages that compile to other
> languages. Jade,
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Ryan O’Hara wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Nicholas Hall wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 8:57 AM, YpN wrote:
>>> I wrote a shell script using mksh, which generates websites.
>>
>> This looks pretty cool. I'm
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 8:57 AM, YpN wrote:
> I wrote a shell script using mksh, which generates websites.
This looks pretty cool. I'm sick of all the shitty hip offline
website generators, and the direction web development is headed in
general -- layer upon layer upon layer. Seriously, these g
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Andrew Gwozdziewycz wrote:
> I wondered if I could do it in shell, but figured it might be too
> tricky to do concisely
$ while ! command; do continue; done; xmessage 'returned truthy'
I use the mouse quite a bit to switch tags when working with virtual
machines and RDP sessions that fill my screen, less the bar. Bringing
mouse support in via patch wouldn't be a big deal.
