On 12/12/2013 16:22, sin wrote:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 04:20:32PM +, Neo Romantique wrote:
I've meant to write "Generally more readable and efficient", but
then after having a second thought I've deleted the readable part,
but had some leftover. :)
Don't top pos
I've meant to write "Generally more readable and efficient", but then
after having a second thought I've deleted the readable part, but had
some leftover. :)
On 12/12/2013 16:18, sin wrote:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 11:13:56AM -0500, Strake wrote:
On 12/12/2013, Neo Roma
C is generally more and efficient, I suppose.
On 12/12/2013 16:04, sin wrote:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 03:42:52PM +, Neo Romantique wrote:
Why Shell, and not C?
Otherwise tool looks interesting.
I don't see why this has to be done in C.
--
Regards,
neo~
http://www.inventat
Why Shell, and not C?
Otherwise tool looks interesting.
On 12/12/2013 14:57, YpN wrote:
Hey dudes,
I wrote a shell script using mksh, which generates websites. You need to write
your pages / posts in HTML or markdown (the project supports smu) and then
the script will "create" your website. I k
