Kamil Cholewiński wrote:
In all seriousness, ii is more of a library [...]
I like the idea anyway, even without extensions.
It's usable, though with a steep leaning curve.
Well, IMHO... Documentation for all
suckless projects... hm, kind of sucks.
Think of it more as a feature :)
"Go figur
So, FIFO in the description[1]
[1]: http://tools.suckless.org/ii/
Kamil Cholewiński wrote:
You probably want irssi or bitchx or xchat or pidgin or ii is when
you know exactly what you need and you see ii is the way to get it.
Think of it as Lego for grownups.
So, FIFO in the description[1] means "fit in or f#$! off"?
By the way, thanks for the recommenda
Hey,
Sorry for kinda noobish question. I can't figure out
how ii works. Here's what I did:
1. compiled it;
2. ran "ii -n -s irc.ubuntu.com" ;
3. "echo "/j #ubuntu" > in" ;
4. and nothing happened.
I checked ~/irc/irc.ubuntu.com/out and there are
channel messages, like "Looking up your hostname
Leonardo Taccari wrote:
> LIBS = -L${X11LIB} -lX11 -Wl,-R${X11LIB} ${XINERAMALIBS} ${FREETYPELIBS}
^ This. My error was the space between "-Wl," and "-R".
Modifying FREETYPEINC is unnecessary, I've uncommented
OpenBSD line.
I'm reading from my smartphone and sometimes
it's hard to say if there
Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> http://www.netbsd.org/docs/elf.html#elf-rpath
This is helpful, though I still can't solve the problem.
I've tried putting "-Wl, -R/usr/X11R7/lib" in config.mk CFLAGS
and got the same error. Putting it in LDFLAGS
causes ld to complain about not being able to find "f
Hi,
I adjusted paths in config.mk:
X11INC = /usr/X11R7/include
X11LIB = /usr/X11R7/lib
FREETYPEINC = ${X11INC}/freetype2
It compiles successfully, but startx/xinitrc
show me X for a second and then it goes
back to tty.
Typing dwm from tty gives
'Shared object "libX11.so.7" not found'
libX11.so
> but find me portable and usable C UI toolkit
> without tons of dependencies
Tcl/Tk
k...@shike2.com wrote:
This is my way of thinking, because if you need asm, then your code is
not portable at all, and then it is better to move the asm to a
function and coded it directly in asm in a .as file.
.S or .asm actually, .as is ActionScript. If my two cents are counted,
I suppose a
We don't want to follow all the extensions of GNU, this is for sure.
If you try to be compatible with GCC at the end you become GCC. If
the big project is C99 or POSIX the our target is begin able to
compile it. If the big project is Linux/GCC,then we don't care
(if you want gcc, you know where to
Anselm R Garbe wrote:
Please update and let me know if it works now. I removed the
Makefile-dependency here. Only remaining place is sys and ncurses.
It installs now successfully.
Anselm R Garbe wrote:
No, can you provide full logs of your last command, just want to see
how it looks and where it might fail.
Here you are.make[1]: Entering directory '/home/mitt/stalibuild/src/etc'
make[1]: Nothing to be done for 'all'.
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/mitt/stalibuild/src
Anselm R Garbe wrote:
I can't reproduce your issue. I renamed src into src2 and performed a
clean build and make install, no such issue.
I can't help but it ran into the same thing again.
Let me describe my process then:
1) mkdir stalibuild in my home
2) cd stalibuild
3) cloning toolchain and
Anselm R Garbe wrote:
Also make sure you are at least using:
http://git.sta.li/src/commit/?id=acbd9df7cbdc6a949c962ca887fb5f8d799c3bfa
No, wait, I looked at mine, it has $(ROOT) too. Alright,
anyway, better be rebuilding the whole world.
Anselm R Garbe wrote:
[...]
Also make sure you are at least using:
http://git.sta.li/src/commit/?id=acbd9df7cbdc6a949c962ca887fb5f8d799c3bfa
Oh, that's the case. Strange, I pulled the entire tree
just yesterday. And also tried replacing
/home/anselm/src with $(ROOT) but it skipped the $(ROOT)
Anselm R Garbe wrote:
So you are talking about src/bin/kbd/Makefile or NOT?
Yes, this one.
Yes, but why do you run make install in src/bin/kbd? You should run
make -f stali.mk install
Sorry, I read it wrong and ran "make -f stali.mk" in src/bin/kbd.
So, I ran "make -f stali.mk install" in
Anselm R Garbe wrote:
Hi there,
Hi,
Which Makefile are you talking about? src/bin/kbd/Makefile should not
be considered, only stali.mk.
I'm talking about this Makefile, because...
Can you provide the output of cd src/bin/kbd && make -f stali.mk
install please?
No errors, which is not s
Marc Collin wrote:
Good idea?
for i in *; do sed -i 's/anselm/$USER/g' "$i"; done
I've tried replacing with "$(ROOT)/../" and
"$USER", with the first it simply skips $(ROOT)
and starts with /../, with the second one
it skips $U and starts with SER; e.g.:
ACLOCAL = ${SHELL} /home/$USER/src/bin
I also found hardcode references to Anselm's
home folder in other Makefiles, apart from kbd:
curl, parted, gzip, libarchive.
There is yet no mksh in /bin (install
destination).
Marc Collin wrote:
It seems to hardcode the user's home path to /home/anselm and the
problem can be you have anther username?
http://git.sta.li/src/tree/bin/kbd/Makefile#n146
I have another username (mitt, obviously :) )
and when I saw it, I though that this is from
one of stali.mk's but could
I forgot to ask, will scc be intended for
building something big, say, GTK+ programmes,
or maybe even the kernel? And what about
inline assembly and compiling assembly code
itself?
/ Mitt
Hey,
I'm trying to build stali, running "make install"
goes fine except for kbd; it entres src/bin/kbd,
then goes
"CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/bash
/home/anselm/src/bin/kbd/config/missing --run aclocal-1.11 -I m4"
and then it certainly fails.
It successfully installs other binar
Louis Santillan wrote:
The C version of Let's Build a Compiler is here [0][1]. There are
multiple versions/recent updates by people other than Peter Gray's
original translation [2][3][4]. The original/Pascal version by Jack
Crenshaw is here [5]. I've also been reading Wirth's original Pascal
c
k...@shike2.com wrote:
[...]
Thanks for the info! I ran "make multi; make install", however...
The error that should not happen is the error related to cc2. Do you
have it in $PREFIX/libexec/scc/?
I tried to ran cc2 from the directory, but it still hangs.
Even if I simply try "./cc2". The s
Hi,
I usually compile suckless software with tcc,
but it fails at static linking, so I found myself
cloning scc.
I changed PREFIX in config.mk to /usr/local and
successfully installed it. First, what are cc1 and cc2?
Also, I couldn't find a man page. Compiling Hello World
with cc1 says it can't
Works here too. If I type something
right after the arrow, the latter cuts
a bit though, being still visible.
Mitt
Bryan Bennett wrote:
Unless I'm reading this improperly, the cursor's color would still
change because of the
if-block between line 3858 and ~3875.
Even if the colour changes, I can't see it.
It looks like you could simply
remove the if-statement
that Pickfire is mentioning entirely and stru
> So, I wonder if cursor shape on inactive terminals could be changed,
> 'tis always an empty block
It's probably a bad idea after all. I then wouldn't be able to
know, what terminal is active before actually typing
something. So, everything is fine.
Thanks,
Mitt
Draco Metallium wrote:
Did you ever change config.def.h? By hand or maybe with another patch?
I did, by hand, after first clone from git. You know, there was no
config.h, so instead of copying config.def.h, I changed the latter.
If so, just add "#define histsize 2000" to it
(just after "stat
Hi everyone,
1) In st I use underline as a cursor, but whatever cursor
I choose, on inactive window there is always an empty block.
2) Trying to apply the patch [1] leads to:
patching file config.h
HUNK #1 failed at 7
...
[I changed config.def.h to config.h,
but even if not, it doesn't
Mattias Andrée wrote:
I did a search on the word, and it came up a lot.
Oh, it is. AT&T files end with .S and NASM's with .asm.
There are much more .S vs .asm - 38 vs 17.
Why writing some code in one with one assembly and some
with another, I wonder.
Mattias Andrée wrote:
No it does not look like NASM, perhaps it was and
older version that used it, perhaps only other
parts of SYSLINUX, NASM is still used in SYSLINUX.
It was a very long time since I looked that it.
I checked pretty much every assembly file, no sign
of NASM there.
Too bad
Mattias Andrée wrote:
The SYSLINUX bootmanager (stage 1) is written in
NASM (assembly with sane syntax)
No wondering, Peter Anvin works at Intel :)
I am actually exloring assembly, but using AT&T syntax,
which I personally prefer.
UPD: if I understand something, this is not
Intel/NASM syntax.
Hi,
1) GRUB2 is too big, but what would you recommend as an alternative?
Say, a bootloader that just boots my machine :)
BSD support would be great.
2) I usually build suckless software with tcc (can't build scc just
yet),
but kernels are usually compiled with gcc and, less frequently, LLVM.
H
Quentin Rameau wrote:
What about with a correct fontconfig name, like
"Droid Sans:style=Bold:size=12"?
It works :)
I don't know what is that Sauerbraten, maybe it needs
some environment variable which isn't correctly setup
in your global env?
Any output there you could analyze?
Sauerbraten
Hi,
My first post here, so I'd like to thank
everyone at suckless working hard to produce
quality software and hackable code.
The first issue is font:
---
static const char *fonts[] = {
"Droid Sans Bold:size=12"
};
---
produces a slightly bigger font than just
"Droid Sans:siz
36 matches
Mail list logo
