On 19 August 2023 12:37:23 am NZST, "Страхиња Радић"
wrote:
>I haven't checked recently, but the most noticeable missing feature of cproc,
>as well as some other compilers, were VLAs. When someone writes the support
>for
>VLAs, cproc & co. will become much more usable.
VLAs are optional in th
On 6 July 2023 3:04:47 am NZST, Dave Blanchard wrote:
>On Thu, 06 Jul 2023 00:01:43 +1200
>Miles Rout wrote:
>
>> There is a page on the website advertising all the many patches available to
>> improve st and dwm.
>> Few if any other software projects provi
On 5 July 2023 6:16:34 am NZST, Dave Blanchard wrote:
>People on this email list tend to go to an extreme in favoring simplicity
>above all else, which is why they release dumpster fires like the ST terminal
>emulator for example which has absolutely no features at all, is riddled with
>bugs an
On 1 July 2023 7:50:20 am NZST, fo...@dnmx.org wrote:
>Vim is also bloated as hell at over 70 SLOC (including comments and
>everything, wc -l).. I'd rather just use pre-installed `vi`..
>I did use Vim in the past. I do miss it, that's why I started my own text
>editor that will be (I hope) as m
I wonder whether filesystems could be more layered. You can already do this to
some extent with LUKS and LVM on Linux, but could you go further? Rather than
having a big monolithic filesystem like ext4, could you run some simpler
filesystem that just did journaling, then on top of that one that
On 24 June 2023 7:13:48 am NZST, fo...@dnmx.org wrote:
>I understand what you are talking about... I once told someone "go kill
>yourself" or "I you die", never again..
>
>I do understand that there are sensitive souls out there, but they are
>coal of
>a fire which gets started by governments and c
Be careful about running a link shortener. They are very prone to abuse. They
don't cost money to run because of bloat but because they require a lot of
moderation. Spam is incessant.
NearlyFreeSpeech bans very little, but treats link shorteners as equivalent to
running a mail server on their s
On 6 May 2023 8:56:23 pm NZST, "Страхиња Радић" wrote:
> But that is pointless to
>bring up here, because the reality is that the programmers who made suckless
>software mostly picked Expat License (and are calling it "the MIT License").
>It
>is irrelevant for non-GPL programs I fork or con
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:23:35AM -0400, Greg Reagle wrote:
> Can someone point me to an article or blog post recommending which of these
> sanitize options would be recommended for general daily use?
Take your favourite Makefile and add
CFLAGS += -fsanitize=address -fsanitize=undefined
LDFLAGS
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 06:45:40AM -0700, Jeremy wrote:
> Regarding readability: in terms of the just the standard libraries, I
> agree that Rust is more readable than C, especially it comes to iterating
> and generics.
impl I {
fn know<'a, How::Someone>(could: &'a Say) -> This<'a>
wit
10 matches
Mail list logo
