That looks nice.
FRIGN a écrit :
>Good evening,
>
>looking at suckless.org, it's almost too bad the well-designed
>suckless-'S' only exists as a favicon.
>The motivation to bring the logo in more prominently is that
>people remember images even better than names, and getting
>attention in regard
On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 06:52:00PM +0100, Marc André Tanner wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 06:22:00PM +0100, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 06:12:00PM +0100, Matthias Rabault wrote:
> > > Thanks for the patch, I'll check it out this evening (can't y
I like your idea of passing a pointer to the config struct, that's cleaner and
if new options are created, we only add them to the config structure without
adding new arguments to editor_new().
Silvan Jegen a écrit :
>On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 06:12:00PM +0100, Matthias Rabault wrote:
&
Thanks for the patch, I'll check it out this evening (can't yet, I'm using my
phone). What I was thinking of was adding code in main() that alters the Editor
structure according to config.def.h defines, just before calling the main loop.
I'm trying that tonight, but what do you think of that ?
I see your point and I agree. I didn't think of that, so I'll have to think of
another way to do that, which doesn't change the prototype. Thanks for the
insight !
Dimitris Papastamos a écrit :
>> -Editor *editor_new(int width, int height) {
>> +Editor *editor_new(int width, int height, int ta
Oops ... The empty line removal was an accident. As to yesterday's blunder, I
knew how to use the preprocessor, I was only tired and did everything too fast
...
Silvan Jegen a écrit :
>Heyhey
>
>On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Matthias Rabault
> wrote:
>> I submitted a
Hello,
I submitted a patch yesterday so that expandtab and tabwidth are set in
config.def.h, but it was complete shit. Discard the other one. This one
should be much better. I had to add arguments to editor_new().
Sorry for yesterday's shitty patch.
---
config.def.h | 3 +++
editor.c | 6 +++
ng, I overlooked that, sorry. If you want me to
split it and resubmit, I can do it.
FRIGN a écrit :
>On Sat, 3 Jan 2015 22:41:19 +0100
>Matthias Rabault wrote:
>
>> The two values were previously supplied as "magic constants".
>
>Well, apart from this idea, what&#x
The two values were previously supplied as "magic constants".
Signed-off-by: Matthias Rabault
This raises another problem with the includes. I had to put some of the
definitions in vis.h, but in turn that made gcc complain that there were
functions declared in vis.h but not defin
