[dev] [dwm] [patch] hide tags with no clients

2012-08-08 Thread Matthew Bauer
I made a patch that hides tags that are not being used to make the bar feel less cluttered. It's a simple visual change similar to how WMII handles tags. I'm pretty sure this has never been posted before, but correct me if I'm wrong. hideempty.patch Description: Binary data

Re: [dev] [dwm] mapping wm state, and other stories

2011-11-09 Thread Matthew Bauer
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Connor Lane Smith wrote: > > I sometimes wonder whether it would be simpler to just make > _NET_WM_STATE_FULLSCREEN switch dwm into monocle mode. Forcing one > window to be at the front very often leads me to accidentally focus > and interact with window hidden behi

Re: [dev] [dwm] ncol layout

2011-10-30 Thread Matthew Bauer
On Oct 30, 2011, at 5:49 PM, Jeremy Jackins wrote: I'm sure someone has thought of this before but it came to me as a nice way to allow multiple clients in master: Pretending for a moment that mod+shift+return didn't spawn a terminal by default, what if we had something like: - mod+return switc

[dev] Re: [surf] Why enable spatial navigation?

2010-08-22 Thread Matthew Bauer
I just realized there was some extra stuff in the patch. A fixed version is attached. On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Matthew Bauer wrote: > Why does surf by default have spatial navigation[1] enabled? I would think > most users would want the up key to move the page up and the down

Re: [dev] [surf] Why enable spatial navigation?

2010-08-22 Thread Matthew Bauer
t of both worlds or something. > > > >On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 02:26:13PM -0500, Matthew Bauer wrote: > > Why does surf by default have spatial navigation[1] enabled? I would > think > > most users would want the up key to move the page up and the down key to > > m

[dev] [surf] Why enable spatial navigation?

2010-08-22 Thread Matthew Bauer
Why does surf by default have spatial navigation[1] enabled? I would think most users would want the up key to move the page up and the down key to move the page down. [1]: http://webkitgtk.org/reference/webkitgtk-WebKitWebSettings.html#WebKitWebSettings--enable-spatial-navigation diff -r 6d9e5939

Re: [dev][surf] Searchengines Patch Update

2010-08-13 Thread Matthew Bauer
You could add a "I'm Feeling Lucky" Google search with: +static SearchEngine searchengines[] = { +{ "g", "http://www.google.com/search?q=%s"; }, +{ "lucky", "http://www.google.com/search?q=%s&btnI=I'm+Feeling+Lucky" }, +{ "leo", "http://dict.leo.org/ende?search=%s"; }, +}; On Fri,

[dev] Suckless design in Games

2010-08-09 Thread Matthew Bauer
What game libraries are suckless? (SDL, OpenGL) What programming language is best for games? (C, Python, or Go)

Re: [dev] [surf] Scrolling with direction keys

2010-08-01 Thread Matthew Bauer
I have the same thing in my surf config. One problem I have noticed however is that if you use an application like Google Spreadsheets, you will not be able to navigate between rows with the up and down keys like you would in a normal browser. On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Nick wrote: > I just

[dev] Fullscreen keyboard shortcut in dwm like in wmii

2010-07-21 Thread Matthew Bauer
Is there an easy way to have a fullscreen keyboard shortcut in dwm like there is in wmii? I was trying to achieve this via xprop with something like this in the config.h: { MODKEY, XK_f, spawn, {.v = (char > *[]){"/bin/sh", "-c", "xprop -id $0 -f _NET_WM_STATE

Re: [dev] Presentation slides software

2010-06-29 Thread Matthew Bauer
. > > > > But the generated HTML is rather messy, and fixing htmlroff is too much > work. > > I can't help here because I don't generate HTML from it. > > > btw: Do you include bitmap pictures into your slides? If so, how? I > read that Heirloom troff has some features therefore, but I think they > are Heirloom extensions. > > > meillo > > -- Matthew Bauer

[dev] goblin - basic shell commands in the Go language

2010-06-25 Thread Matthew Bauer
el free to fork it: http://bitbucket.org/matthewbauer/goblin -- Matthew Bauer

Re: [dev] Interesting post about X11

2010-06-16 Thread Matthew Bauer
But yet we still use X11. X11 release date: September 1987 On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:35:57PM -0500, Matthew Bauer wrote: > > Wouldn't porting the Plan9 window system (rio I think) to Linux be a good > > replac

[dev] Convert Suckless Projects Documentation to a More Simple Language

2010-06-16 Thread Matthew Bauer
constructed language such as Esperanto is designed to be easily understood and simple. Even though they might not be perfect they are an improvement over English. -- Matthew Bauer

Re: [dev] Interesting post about X11

2010-06-16 Thread Matthew Bauer
Wouldn't porting the Plan9 window system (rio I think) to Linux be a good replacement for X? -- Matthew Bauer

Re: [dev] Suckless operating system

2010-06-14 Thread Matthew Bauer
to apply chunked > > encoding to the http headers? > Granted, decimal vs hex inconsistency is plain weird. But nobody is > forcing you (as a httpd implementor) to actually use (chunked) trailing > headers, though it´s a different story for clients. > > -- > kv, > - Bjartur > > -- Matthew Bauer

Re: [dev] Suckless operating system

2010-06-13 Thread Matthew Bauer
I think surf and uzbl are good steps forward in making a kiss web browser. On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Anders Andersson wrote: > > Is it possible to have an OS for desktop/laptop everyday use (multimedia, > web, > > programming, research, ..) which is actualy usable, not rotten inside and >

Re: [dev] stderr: unnecessary?

2010-06-10 Thread Matthew Bauer
No, I just don't understand why you need a stderr when you have a stdout. Couldn't you just print your error to stdout? On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Samuel Baldwin wrote: > 2010/6/10 Matthew Bauer : > > Does anyone else think that stderr shouldn't be used in Un

[dev] stderr: unnecessary?

2010-06-10 Thread Matthew Bauer
Does anyone else think that stderr shouldn't be used in Unix-like systems? I think that it could be replaced by stdout.

[dev] Re: Is Mercurial (hg) suckless?

2010-06-09 Thread Matthew Bauer
Okay sorry, I already asked this before but somehow never got the replys back and forgot about it. On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Matthew Bauer wrote: > Would Mercurial be considered suckless? > > I've always wondered why suckless projects use Mercurial instead of the >

[dev] Is Mercurial (hg) suckless?

2010-06-09 Thread Matthew Bauer
Would Mercurial be considered suckless? I've always wondered why suckless projects use Mercurial instead of the standard git for version control that is used by most Linux projects. Isn't Git more simpler than Mercurial?

[dev] Why use Mercurial?

2010-02-13 Thread Matthew Bauer
Why do Wmii and DWM use Mercurial? Aren't they targeted at Linux systems and isn't Git a lot faster on Linux? I just wanted to know, because Wmii in my opinion is one of the most Unix like projects out there, and I wanted to know why you'd use Mercurial instead of Git.