Страхиња,
On 10/24/23, Страхиња Радић wrote:
> On 23/10/23 03:11PM, Kyryl Melekhin wrote:
>> Since this is my creation I might be biased, but I still think that Nextvi
>> is
>> the best suckless editor.
>
> That should be left for others to decide.
>
>
>>
Hey guys,
On this topic, I would like to revisit Nextvi. It's been a year since
my last post.
The editor has been getting some lovely quality of life updates while still
adhering to the original philosophy.
Since this is my creation I might be biased, but I still think that Nextvi is
the best suc
Hi, just don't use version 31, it's just broken IIRC.
Compile 29.4.6
Hello Ryan,
Ryan Raymond wrote:
> Hello all. I'm working on a suckless cmatrix clone.
> It's not done yet, and it still suffers from constant memory leakage, but
> I'm having fun working on it.
> It already shows 50% reduced cpu/ram usage vs cmatrix, despite greatly
> improved fps. Furthermore,
"Greg Reagle" wrote:
> I have a file named "out" (from ii) that I want to view. Of course, it can
> grow while I am viewing it. I can view it with "tail -f out" or "less +F out
> ", both of which work. I also want to apply some processing in a pipeline,
> something like "tail -f out | tr a A |
Michael Hendricks wrote:
> Agreed.
>
> > If anybody wants to go and fix the build let me know of your fork or
> > patch as I want to try it, out of curiosity.
>
> After cloning the repo[1], I ran `autoreconf -fi` to generate a
> configure script. Then `./configure && make`. Aside from the
> auto
Greg Minshall wrote:
> Michael,
>
> > You might like se[1]. It's a screen-oriented version of ed. It can be
> > helpful for certain editing tasks where visual feedback is wanted.
> > ...
> > 1: https://github.com/screen-editor/se/
>
> very nice. thanks for the pointer!
>
> cheers, Greg
I've he
Daniel Littlewood wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There was a recent chat about cat -v & single-purpose programs which
> has been rattling around my head for the last few weeks. There are
> *many* bloated code editors (atom, vscode, etc.), but most people
> usually present either emacs or vim as an alternat
craekz wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 11:47:56AM +, Daniel Littlewood wrote:
> > It seems to me like the obvious alternative workflow would be, rather
> > than to have a single monolithic program for the general job of
> > "editing text" (which is really lots of jobs pretending to be one),
Greg Minshall wrote:
> i think it was a Rob Pike paper, maybe Usenix, probably in the 1990s.
> the idea, iirc, is that you can always pipe the output of cat(1) into
> od(1), or into any other program you wanted, so keep cat simple. good
> paper (but, sometimes i do `cat -v`).
By the way, here i
wrote:
> Why is cat -v considered bad? I see that people often bring up
> this particular example as a way to illustrate bad extensions, but
> what exactly makes it so?
Hi, by design cat is not supposed to be used for printing stuff
to the terminal. The fact that it does in the first place is a
Hello guys,
I recently tried out Wayland and here are some of my thoughts.
They market it as a "shiny new object". OK. So I compiled all the libs,
and tried the dwl compositor. I like suckless and dwl supposed to be
like dwm but on wayland.
Let's perform a simple test: I open the foot terminal (
https://github.com/kyx0r/pikevm
Suckless regex implementation, please consider.
Bye,
Kyryl.
Splitting of code into separate programs in a lot of cases can create
more bloat. Unix philosophy is not the be all end all; you have to
weigh the benefits and drawbacks to see where it makes sense. In this
case using dwm for all your shortkeys is less bloat than using sxhkd
which does a lot more s
Jeremy wrote:
> What does Ada(or Rust for that matter) do better than C?
>
> Surely, you have all of the tools for static analysis, debugging, macros
> for C that you would for any other language, no?
>
> I could understand generics, interfaces, iterators, OOP and all of that
> from a masturbator
Mart Zirnask wrote:
> I will definitely try out neatvi, but shouldn't you mention somewhere
> in your readme that it is a fork of Ali Gohlami Rudi's neatvi? [1] His
> other framebuffer applications [2] would probably also deserve a place
> in the 'rocks' listing.
True, it does not mention that i
Hello suckless community, in the past few month's I have been
working on 2 programs (mostly for myself, because everything else
really sucks) and I believe that they have come to the point of
being ready for production.
Therefore I request you to update the "rocks" page on suckless.org.
Onscreen
filip wrote:
> Hello,
> I have set up bindings for zooming, but when I try to zoom it only
> scrolls...
> Is this is a common issue?
>
> //F
Greetings,
Zoom does not work in st if you are using bitmap fonts. Or it does work,
but only for the dimensions you have for that specific font. So if you
This bug is very exceptional and will only affect users who run other
terminal programs with st.
For example running
" st -e vim . "
" st -e lynx "
etc ...
The bug happens randomly, and on some systems may not even exist, very
hard to reproduce and predict. On my system with clean st build
changes
dev+subscr...@suckless.org
20 matches
Mail list logo
