On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Anh Hai Trinh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm sharing some simple rc scripts for wmii, notably to manage status
> bars using separate processes and also a search+goto-window script.
>
> It's at: https://github.com/aht/wmiirc
>
>
> P.S. Looking at http://wmii.suckless.org
On 1/15/12, Bastien Dejean wrote:
> Florian Limberger:
>
>> This is more likely a problem of your colorscheme, for example my
>> active border is #ff9900, which is very unlikely to be the background
>> color of any window.
>
> No: this is more likely a general design problem as stated in my
> orig
On 1/9/12, Thomas Dahms wrote:
> 2012/1/8 John Matthewman :
>> I would like a window manager that has wmii's acme-like window
>> management, but without the 9P filesystem, wmiir, support for
>> configuration via python, ruby, etc. Trim the fat off of it (or
>> p
On 1/8/12, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> Someone could implement a stacked mode patch for dwm based on two
> extra windows (similar to the dwm bar) per column -- wouldn't be too
> hard.
I would like a window manager that has wmii's acme-like window
management, but without the 9P filesystem, wmiir, supp
On 12/31/11, Manolo Martínez wrote:
> On 12/30/11 at 03:35pm, Kurt H Maier wrote:
>> I love arch linux's facility for coralling all the nitwits into one
>> self-contained forum. It just sucks when some of the retardation leaks
>> out into the real world.
>>
>> I think it would be better if it wer
On 7/1/11, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> pancake wrote:
>> - the thingmenu fails to handle menus with no ':' if you do something
>> like:
>>
>> $ thingmenu firefox xterm gedit
>>
>> clicking on any menu results in executing an uninitialized buffer because
>> it
>> should be:
Can anybody recommend a simple point-and-click application launcher
for X? dmenu works nicely as a general purpose menu, but there are a
select few applications I use routinely that I'd like to be able to
click a button to open whenever needed. It would be handy to have a
little launcher sitting at
On 6/25/11, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> Progress update. You can edit things, but we don't have the B-tree in
> place yet, so I'm mostly working on the peripherals. I'll set up a
> repo very soon, though aside from my UTF-8 and display abstraction
> library I have little to show, yet.
>
> Here's a
On 6/7/11, Yue Wu wrote:
> Smartphone has another function that hardly can be replaced by other
> tools: note taking. Pen and paper aren't convenient for processing into
> digital. For this purpose, I think Palm treo series is the best.
I would much rather keep a small notebook and pen with me fo
On 6/6/11, ilf wrote:
> I actually only want a Browser and a usable Terminal with an SSH-Client.
Well there's your problem. Save your money and get a dumbphone --
like, maybe one of the cheapest models of Nokia candy-bar-shaped
phones -- and then use a computer for the browser and terminal.
Netbo
On 6/3/11, Sir Cyrus wrote:
> What's the most suckless Linux distribution?
Maybe slackware?
Arch is loaded with suck.
While debian (stable) is definitely not what most -- if not all? --
people would describe as suckless, it is what I use on my computer.
John
PS: as somebody else said, this di
On 6/2/11, Rafa Garcia Gallego wrote:
> - Most "normal" editors *do* have a slight modality (e.g. replace
> instead of insert, etc). Sandy does have a different behavior when
> selecting text vs. when moving, but it is bearable and IMHO it does no
> lead to confussion. Some questions: do we want t
On 6/1/11, pancake wrote:
> and this is why im telling why modal editor is necessary if we dont want
> to fall into a emacs-like hell.
I wouldn't go so far as to say that it's necessary -- or that not
going modal will result in falling into an Emacs-like hell. Isn't the
goal a simple, little edit
On 5/29/11, Rafa Garcia Gallego wrote:
> Thinking about a couple of issues now:
>
> 1.- The regexes used for syntax highlight relied on a GNU extension
> (\< \> to mark word boundaries). We changed those to \b, which is the
> POSIX equivalent, but some testing has determied this does not work in
>
Hi there - I had been looking for a simple little editor for a while.
Thanks for sharing.
On 5/27/11, Rafa Garcia Gallego wrote:
> That is indeed a great idea. I'll try to stick with the UNIX defaults,
> fill in with Emacs when in doubt and remove META when possible.
Yea, probably a good idea (o
On 2/17/11, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> Funny how people can't answer to simple feedback these days. I was
> looking for experience sharing but it seems this ml was the wrong
> place.
>
> - benoît
Ask a stupid question, get a . (I'll let you fill in the blank!)
But even if you were asking your
On 10/22/10, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:02:00AM +, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
>> I'd like a Surf interface to Dillo or NetSurf, without any JavaScript
>> support. You only need to interpret JavaScript on web pages that suck.
>> The suckless part of the web is quite usabl
On 10/15/10, Yue Wu wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I want to use color code to describe color, but I just can recorgnize the
> color, don't know anything about colorcode, is there any recommended
> suckless color picker that can let me choise a color then return a color
> code?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Yue Wu
On 5/17/10, julien steinhauser wrote:
>
> I guess you have good reasons to have your own context menu,
> but the default gtk one with the underlined letters
> is keyboard friendlier to me as one just need to hit
> the underlined letter to select an entry.
I've been wondering about the context men
19 matches
Mail list logo
