Re: [dev] simple portscanner

2010-02-26 Thread James PIC
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 6:39 PM, anonymous wrote: > On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 11:46:36AM -0500, Ray Kohler wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 11:37 AM, anonymous wrote: >> > On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 02:04:37PM +0100, hiro wrote: >> >> licenses are stupid >> >> >> > >> > I agree. What should be done to

[dev] Xinerama sucks

2009-10-16 Thread James PIC
Hi, Is there any dwm-like WM that supports multiple screens but uses randr instead of the Xinerama infamny? I think that randr is more useful because of dynamic configuration support (ie. screen hotplug or unplug). Regards, James.

Re: [dev] [st] goals / non-goals for st?

2009-08-23 Thread James PIC
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Ray Kohler wrote: > - Will it implement enough of xterm's capabilities that I could lie > about $TERM and expect it to mostly work? I log into many remote > machines of various OS types and ages, and some of them don't make it > easy to install user-specific termin

Re: [dev] dwm-5.6.1

2009-07-27 Thread James PIC
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 10:51 AM, James PIC wrote: > I though xinerama uses software and randr uses hardware, isn't that > supposed to be more optimal? > PS: Subquestion: wouldn't it have required less source diff?

Re: [dev] dwm-5.6.1

2009-07-27 Thread James PIC
Hi Anselm, Sorry if this questions were already answered before. Why depend on xinerama for multihead setups instead of randr? I though xinerama uses software and randr uses hardware, isn't that supposed to be more optimal? Is there a nice CLI tool for xinerama like xrandr for randr? If not, s

Re: [dev] email

2009-07-04 Thread James PIC
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Uriel wrote: > How can I send email? > > Thanks. > Black magic.

Re: [dev] Suckless (*NIX|*BSD) Distribution?

2009-06-21 Thread James PIC
Man bash man portage On Jun 20, 2009 2:50 PM, "Kurt H Maier" wrote: On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 4:22 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > That way I can set up a ... Ubuntu is an utter nightmare to use on anything but a "workstation" system. They ship broken packages, break currently-working packages, fail

Re: [dev] Re: last request for a dev-only list

2009-06-14 Thread James PIC
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Thomas Gallen wrote: > Obviously fun should also be outlawed on the internet along with humor > and curiousity. And post poning

Re: [dev] Re: last request for a dev-only list

2009-06-12 Thread James PIC
Phpbb > nntp On Jun 12, 2009 2:05 PM, "David Engster" wrote: James PIC writes: > I suggest make an NNTP group for suckless, or open a PHPBB ... A little remark: you can read the mailing list via nntp through Gmane (gmane.comp.window-managers.wmii). Actually, that's wha

Re: [dev] last request for a dev-only list

2009-06-12 Thread James PIC
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Premysl Hruby wrote: > On (12/06/09 12:15), Daniel Bainton wrote: >> To: dev mail list >> From: Daniel Bainton >> Subject: Re: [dev] last request for a dev-only list >> Reply-To: dev mail list >> List-Id: dev mail list >> >> But people are idiots, they don't kno

Re: [dev] last request for a dev-only list

2009-06-11 Thread James PIC
Maybe a bbs would be better. With plenty of sections! !!;))) On Jun 11, 2009 8:19 PM, "Jeremy Jay" wrote: Again, I know how easy it is to set up filters, and I've done it before, but unsubscribing is an even more simple solution. I think dev@ is pretty self-explanatory, it should be for bug re

Re: [dev] [OT] Political Propaganda

2009-06-11 Thread James PIC
Gpdwin On Jun 11, 2009 7:27 PM, "Robert C Corsaro" wrote: Kurt H Maier wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Robert C Corsaro< rcors...@optaros.com> wro... Bah. The whole conversation is a little silly. I admit that I know nothing.

Re: [dev]

2009-05-22 Thread James PIC
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Ricardo Catalinas Jiménez wrote: > > > Got it. Apparently, the ML is working very fine, thanks a lot ! Maybe there isn't any need for more tests? Cheers, James

Re: [dev] test, ignore

2009-05-21 Thread James PIC
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > test > >