> On 10/11/2015, David Phillips wrote:
> > Just wondering what the rest of the community reckons about an issue
> > that popped up briefly on IRC.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > What do you all think?
> >
Agreed that the way patches are being named right now is confusing.
Dates and/or refs in the name would
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 02:09:23PM +0200, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 06:50:17PM +0800, Pickfire wrote:
> > Hi, I set the xorg termination with `localectl`. When using `slock`, I
> > press Ctrl+Alt+Backspace and it works, the Xorg is killed and go back to
> > the shell.
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 02:59:00PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> I could push out more releases and tag nearly every new feature that’s
> stable, if you like. But here’s my view that struggles me. I am using
> releases to reconsider what’s done in the project and what could be done
> next.
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 02:18:01PM -0400, Greg Reagle wrote:
> I don't know git well, just the basics, but why don't you use a git
> commit id as the target for patching and packaging? As far as I
> understand, a tag is just a "friendly" name for a commit id anyway.
1) How do I know if a certain
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 11:16:52AM +0200, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> Hi!
>
> There have been more then 2 years since 0.6 surf release (2013-02-10).
> Maybe it is time for 0.7?
As a packager, I'd very much appreciate tagging once in a while so that we have
static targets for patching and packagi
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 08:57:12PM +0200, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> Well, GitHub is the sourceforge of the tens... so the most sucking
> aspect about GitHub as of today is its content. Every hipster can host
> his crapware there. And it feels like 95% of all GitHub repos are
> actually some kind of h
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 09:44:05AM -0400, Andrew Gwozdziewycz wrote:
> Arch is pretty good, has great documentation and is quite lightweight.
> I must complain about the use of systemd, which is, in my opinion, not
> very suckless at all. No other complaints though.
Running arch without systemd is
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:19:15PM -0600, Josh Lawrence wrote:
> I'm curious to know what flavor of *nix people on this list use on a
> day-to-day basis.
Debian and Alpine (in containers) on servers, my own Arch spinoff[1] on
desktops. Arch has a huge software library and provides all the tools to
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 08:14:20PM +0400, Jack L. Frost wrote:
> Note that the currently latest tag doesn't change permissions on already
> existing device nodes. If you need it to do that, grab the latest commit.
Not the case anymore, 0.2.1 includes the commit that fixes it.
Also smdev is available from AUR on Arch.
On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 01:59:47PM +0100, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> Greetings everyone.
>
> smdev[0] is now hosted on suckless.org. It is a simple/suckless
> mdev alternative. smdev has similar semantics to mdev. For those
> used to mdev it should b
Note that the currently latest tag doesn't change permissions on already
existing device nodes. If you need it to do that, grab the latest commit.
On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 01:59:47PM +0100, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> Greetings everyone.
>
> smdev[0] is now hosted on suckless.org. It is a simple
break;
> + }
> case '\0':
> break;
> default:
> @@ -204,6 +218,7 @@ parsefield(const char *field, int low, i
>
> r->low = min;
> r->high = max;
> + r->div = div;
>
No */n for “every n ”?
Pretty much useless without that if you ever need a command to be run every
five minutes, for example.
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 12:34:10PM +0300, Ari Malinen wrote:
> I made cron daemon because vixie-cron was too complex for my taste. It
> does the job for me. Maybe someone
13 matches
Mail list logo
