Hi,
>
> I agree with you in some things, but I don't think this the proper
> place where discuss this point. The decision should be taken by a
> group of terminal developers, so I suggust you try to create a way
> developers can discuss about it (some kind of news group or a mailing
> list), and
s well-formed SGR, and remember that SGR has
"accumulative" design.
We don't know we should ignore what range of parameters because original SGR
don't have the concept of "combined parameters".
It is natural that each parameters are to be interpreted or ignored
individually.
-- Hayaki Saito
Sorry, please let me make corrections:
wrong:
CSI 38 Pr ; Pg ; Pb m -> CSI ? Pr ; Pg ; Pb $ m
CSI 48 Pr ; Pg ; Pb m -> CSI = Pr ; Pg ; Pb $ m
correct:
CSI 38 ; 2 ; Pr ; Pg ; Pb m -> CSI ? Pr ; Pg ; Pb $ m
CSI 48 ; 2 ; Pr ; Pg ; Pb m -> CSI = Pr ; Pg ; Pb $ m
-- Hayaki Saito
all-escapes.txt
I'm happy if above proposal would be accepted because my terminals and some my
tools can ignore them properly by considering ISO-6429.
Regards.
-- Hayaki Saito
