tle slower than normal hand coded assembly
programs for the 6502.
So you can do many things with it.
// Daniel V.
uctions to a VM or a Soft Core for an FPGA.
So it's made to save time in development, and give a higher
understanding on what exactly is done. Giving more brain power left,
to solve actual problems.
SCC looks interesting thou.
// Daniel V.
2016-07-23 1:15 GMT+02:00, Quentin Carbonneaux :
&
2016-07-22 22:51 GMT+02:00, Robert Ransom :
> http://lmgtfy.com/?q=free+Git+hosting
>
Ha, ha, ha...
Thanks for the link :-)
// Daniel V.
e until I
> see it with my
> own two eyes.
>
> regards,
> Lukáš
>
It's not a VM-based language. It generates machine code, or byte code.
And it don't need a runtime library, or VM.
// Daniel V.
2016-07-22 21:51 GMT+02:00, Quentin Carbonneaux :
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 08:46:50PM +0200, Daniel V wrote:
>> Is there any interest in a small new computer language?
>
> What would it do better than C?
>
> If it's just a compiler improvement, we're already wo
because I needed to make
custom compilers for my new ISA (instruction set architecture)
research, for making new processors. And I got tired of writing test
programs, by hand coding machine code.
Is there any need for a new language, or is C good enough?
// Daniel V.
