Re: [dev] [proposal] suckless-nettools

2017-07-07 Thread Daniel Hammond
No worries! Not a big fan of all the outside dependencies, but I'm not going anywhere near the 80211 stack for a proper solution. That is *way* above my meager abilities. ⁣Sent from BlueMail ​ On Jul 7, 2017, 6:52 AM, at 6:52 AM, christopher.waldon@gmail.com wrote: >Nifty. I might play with

Re: [dev] [proposal] suckless-nettools

2017-07-07 Thread Daniel Hammond
No one should be using WEP in this day and age, and I stand by that. Besides that, isn't the entire point and purpose of suck less to judge other technologies as bloated and/or unnecessary? I don't see why some judgemental snark would be against that spirit. Anyway, "Don't be retarded" is prett

Re: [dev] [proposal] suckless-nettools

2017-07-06 Thread Daniel Hammond
Can you elaborate further? "Not useful" is kind of relative. On Jul 6, 2017, 6:13 PM, at 6:13 PM, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote: >wpa_gui and wpa_cli usage should be endorsed. wrapping it like this is >not useful.

[dev] [proposal] suckless-nettools

2017-07-06 Thread Daniel Hammond
Hi, all: I've put together a suite of net scripts that were inspired by the suckless philosophy. I'm trying to avoid nonsense like network.d, netctl, etc. by just using the tools (most) distros ship with, like ip and iw. Link is thusly: https://github.com/rdhammond/suckless-nettools It curren