I've got one of the high-res monitors and everything looks really
tiny. I notec xfce4 has this
"scale everything by 2" feature that addresses this, what's the
easiest way to get this in dwm?
I didn't see any patch saying it does it, might have missed one though
there are so many now :)
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 00:52:03 +0300
> Alexander Krotov wrote:
>
> Hey Alexander,
>
>> As Laslo Hunhold suggests down the thread, this solution is likely to
>> be more complex.
>>
>> To implement it properly, you have to implement a whole VT i
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Nick Warne wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Was going to use this to monitor battery, but HUNK #10 fails - looking
> at the patch and dwm.c, the code is totally different at around line
> 664:
>
> Hunk #7 succeeded at 292.
> Hunk #8 succeeded at 516.
> Hunk #9 succeeded at 566
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 1:18 AM, Jochen Sprickerhof
wrote:
> * Britton Kerin [2016-08-30 14:21]:
>> I don't, sorry. Given Martin's statement about scrollback patch I guess
>> there's
>> a good chance it's actually due to that.
>
> Please note tha
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Ivan Delalande wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:39:41PM -0800, Britton Kerin wrote:
>> btw, st sometime seems to eat input, and fail to output lines. You
>> might want to
>> try it without dvtm sometime in case that progr
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:57 PM, Martin Kühne wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Britton Kerin
> wrote:
>>
>> The point is it's *much* easier for you to do it. You know how terminal
>> programming works already, I don't. I *could* do it, but it wou
> So it's sufficient to dump the bloated mess LibreOffice is and use
> Abiword and Gnumeric. At least from the latter I know it is also
> heavily used at CERN, which explains why it even has superior
> data analysis tools than Excel itself.
I like gnumeric a lot also. The only fear is that GNOME
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Martin Kühne wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Britton Kerin
> wrote:
>>> Fix the patches.
>>
>> I have no idea how and I haven't found suckless people fun to work with
>>
>
> Interesting how you switch a vi
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 19:42:13 +0200 Britton Kerin
> wrote:
>> I realize it's a non-goal
>
> Then why do you send this useless mail?
Because I care enough to call bs on s
I realize it's a non-goal
I realize there are patches that sort of work (still jumps to bottom
on output unfortunately)
It should be a goal because it's generally desirable and the
alternative mentioned on the web page isn't.
I use st because it let me control fonts precisely on new high-res
mon
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 1:55 PM, FRIGN wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Aug 2016 23:33:06 +0200
> Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
>
> Hey Christoph,
>
>> Everything should be GPLv3, you are right.
>
> let's not discuss this here. You know my position on the GPL,
> and I know yours.
>
>> Please don’t w
> If you're going to make an argument against systemd, please make a
> stronger one. Repeated noise doesn't help The Cause™, as it seems to be
> around these parts.
why all in pid 1? Seems like they didn't want you to be able to choose,
that sucks. They even gave up the robustness that could hav
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Kurt Van Dijck
wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 13:34:31 +0200
>> From: Hadrien LACOUR
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 08:26:42AM -0300, Marc Collin wrote:
>> > I got introduced to s6-rc [0] lately.
>> > Do you guys have any experience with it?
>> >
>> > [0] http://s
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Ben Woolley wrote:
> I think it is natural for related changes to be consolidated over time. Think
> of punctuated equilibrium.
>
> Maybe after it is clear that some patches just go well together, fitting a
> related niche, they could be consolidated to make main
dwm needs patches to be good but the patches area is a mess and I
couln't get along with devs about fixing it, so I thought a pre-rolled
version of dwm might be useful instead:
brittonkerin.com/sdwm
It consists of the dwm head + the following fixed and merged patches:
=pertag=
because having
It looks like multi monitor support has been merged into mainline
anyway and this patch hasn't been updated in a while. I don't use
multi monitor setup so don't know about this stuff. Is this patch
still potentially useful or should it go away?
Britton
It sounds like it does something good, but it build fails when applied
to commits from the date given on its wiki page, which is my best
guess as to what version it's targeting.
dwm-r1615-mpdcontrol.diff is another example, there are others
I'd consider taking these off the public page until some
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 7:20 PM, Evan Gates wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Eric Pruitt wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 04:22:51PM -0800, Britton Kerin wrote:
>>> There are some diffs like this one from columns patch:
>>>
>>> dwm-r1580-col.dif
There are some diffs like this one from columns patch:
dwm-r1580-col.diff
What are these r1580-style things supposed to refer to?
Britton
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:14 PM, FRIGN wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:42:37 -0800
> Britton Kerin wrote:
>
> Hey Britton,
>
>> Below is a list of what I intend to do about the remaining (obvious)
>> defects in the dwm patches.
>> The last line of each paragra
Below is a list of what I intend to do about the remaining (obvious)
defects in the dwm patches.
The last line of each paragraph is what I have in mind, please object
now so I don't waste my time, thx.
checking dwm, attachabove, dwm-git-20120406-attachabove.diff
prog dwm patch attachabove diff dw
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 10:30 AM, FRIGN wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 13:14:30 -0800
> Britton Kerin wrote:
>
> Hey Britton,
>
>> This was the agreed format but in a way it's a change for the worse.
>> It splits the thing patched against (prog+version) into two par
I just pushed a commit which renames a bunch of stuff like so:
dwm-6.1-uselessgap.diff => dwm-uselessgap-6.1.diff
dwm-cdec978-alwaysfullscreen.diff =>
dwm-alwaysfullscreen-git-20130827-cdec978.diff
This was the agreed format but in a way it's a change for the worse.
It splits the thing patched a
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Eric Pruitt wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 01:54:13PM -0800, Britton Kerin wrote:
>> I'm not going to try to fix patches I don't use myself, it's possible
>> to screw up and testing is a hassle since it involves the wm.
>
> I
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:38 PM, FRIGN wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 10:01:43 -0800
> Britton Kerin wrote:
>
>>
>
> the right format is
>
> --.diff
So there are three categories of problematic patches:
1. Patches that don't follow the naming convention
2.
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:07 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> On 16 June 2016 at 16:15, FRIGN wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 07:27:58 +0200
>> Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>>> I would suggest to use: -->> hash>-.patch
>>
>> st-externalpipe-ea87104-160423.patch
>>
>
> Well, fair enough. My final sugg
Here's a fixed version of dwmfifo using the naming conventions that
seem current give
practice in st and discussion here: since it's against a release
version nothing but that
in the tag.
I like the st format for names of patches against non-release ok,
though I can see the
case for git commit as
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:25 AM, FRIGN wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 19:21:58 +0800
> Pickfire wrote:
>
> Hey Pickfire,
>
>> I suggest using the same syntax as in st which is well maintained, eg:
>>
>> st-scrollback.diff
>> st-git-20151217-scrollback.diff
>
> yeah my bad, this is the c
Some patches show up on the patches page like e.g.:
dwm-6.1-dwmfifo.diff (6.9k) (29.01.2014)
dwm-6.1-save_floats.diff (1605b) (20140209)
The -6.1- substring seems to imply that these patches are intended to
apply cleanly to version 6.1, but the date strings that are appended
suggest that maybe th
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Stephen Paul Weber
wrote:
>> I'm wondering if there's a way to easily synthesize an X click event and
>> others?
>
> Maybe look into how xdotool does it?
Looks like just using xdotool will work great, thx
Britton
I like swarp I'm wondering if there's a way to easily synthesize an X
click event and others?
google seems to be confused by javascript searchers on this one
Britton
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Cág wrote:
> Britton Kerin wrote:
>
>> Sometimes I can gracefully resize st windows, sometimes
>> only by a jerk or two and then the grab seems to die.
>
>> Window movement, even by the very edges of
>> the window, doesn'
Sometimes I can gracefully resize st windows, sometimes only by a jerk
or two and then the grab seems to die. Same for complex iceweasel
windows so it looks not related to client redrawing, but it does seem
like a race of some sort. Sometimes it seems to get a good grip and I
can run the pointer
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Carlos Torres wrote:
> Hi Britton,
>
> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Britton Kerin
> wrote:
>>
>> What I'm really looking to do is replace scrollback in gnome-terminal
>
> there might be a scrollback patch on the suckless s
it comes out with lots of sequences like for example in here:
[31m$[0m ls[0m[01;34marchive[0m/
[01;34mDesktop[0m/
This is apparently different that what is produced by the script
command (which both cat on an st terminal and the less program render
with colors). I looked for less -r -R etc. thin
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:54 PM, FRIGN wrote:
> On Tue, 17 May 2016 16:12:31 -0800
> Britton Kerin wrote:
>
> Hey Britton,
>
>> There are a couple problems:
>
> then fix them god damn it! Suckless is a group of people who take
> matters into their own hands. Clo
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:48 PM, Staven wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 04:12:31PM -0800, Britton Kerin wrote:
>> The into page that did get me going was:
>> http://rhunter.org/blog/2012/04/17/dwm-a-tutorial-for-beginners/
>
> I was always under the impression that dwm was
There are a couple problems:
http://dwm.suckless.org/tutorial has:
Launching
To launch dwm, ideally you should setup a ~/.xinitrc with at least exec dwm.
this is arrangement-specific without mentioning the fact. It doesn't
work with most session setups on linux at least. It should be changed
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Eric Pruitt wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 02:05:58PM -0800, Britton Kerin wrote:
>> Is it possible to run dwm and keep my desktop icons somehow? I have
>> most of my projects sort of geographically organized there which sucks
>> I know bu
I just replaced ancient laptop yes I hate gnome3 too now but having
lots of other shit to do and already behind from this "upgrade" I
can't afford break my whole system lose desktop icons etc all at once
Is it possible to run dwm and keep my desktop icons somehow? I have
most of my projects sort
40 matches
Mail list logo
