Re: [dev] dwm patch: saveinfo

2011-08-28 Thread Benoit T
hi On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 11:27:57AM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote: > On 28 August 2011 11:23, Benoit T wrote: > > BTW., i am not sure which branch i should follow right now.  Someone > > should close or merge the dangling head at rev 1565:ee4aa582320a at > > http:

Re: [dev] dwm patch: saveinfo

2011-08-28 Thread Benoit T
hello all, On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 10:34:05AM +0200, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > On 27 August 2011 00:40, Ladd Hoffman wrote: > > This patch enables saving tags to disk when dwm exits, > > and loading from disk on startup. I don't like a wm writing to permanent storage, especially for this. Over tim

Re: [dev] run a program and display on a specific tab

2011-06-06 Thread Benoit T
hello, if you were referring to dwm rather than wmii... On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 02:49:57PM +0100, Piotr Zalewa wrote: > >>I want to create a script which will load my default setup (quite a > >>few programs). > > > >I use .xinitrc for this. ... or .xsession > I don't want to do it every time t

Re: [dev] dwm does something bad to X.org 1.7.6

2010-04-14 Thread Benoit T
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 09:24:43PM -0400, Andrew Antle wrote: > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > > Can you use hg tip dwm and redirect its output to some file and send > > me the output, perhaps that gives us an idea what is going on in this > > new xorg server. > > Hello

Re: [dev] hg path to suckless

2010-04-14 Thread Benoit T
good evening On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 08:47:40AM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > On 14 April 2010 01:39, Benoit T wrote: > > when was http://code.suckless/hg/dwm decommissioned in favor of > > http://hg.suckless.org/dwm ? > > I wish we had the tld suckless ;) ha, that would

[dev] hg path to suckless

2010-04-13 Thread Benoit T
hello when was http://code.suckless/hg/dwm decommissioned in favor of http://hg.suckless.org/dwm ? cheers -- Benoit Triquet .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `-our own. R

Re: [dev] dwm does something bad to X.org 1.7.6

2010-04-13 Thread Benoit T
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:58:58PM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > On 13 April 2010 23:29, Benoit T wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 03:55:46PM +0600, mikhail maluyk wrote: > >> I have the same problem. After latest update on development version of > >> debian, Xorg b

Re: [dev] dwm does something bad to X.org 1.7.6

2010-04-13 Thread Benoit T
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 03:55:46PM +0600, mikhail maluyk wrote: > I have the same problem. After latest update on development version of > debian, Xorg behaviour is insane. I'm not sure dwm is causing the trouble insane how? cpu consomption? event lagging? those are what i saw. > though. neither

Re: [dev] dwm does something bad to X.org 1.7.6

2010-04-12 Thread Benoit T
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 01:29:23PM +0200, Uriel wrote: > Doing something bad to X.org is a good thing. fair enough. i have additional data about the phenomenon but nothing conclusive yet. i will share this shortly, in case anybody has an idea. cheers -- Benoit Triquet .''`. : :' : We are

[dev] dwm does something bad to X.org 1.7.6

2010-04-08 Thread Benoit T
Hello, Debian testing has replaced Xorg 1.7.5 with 1.7.6 about 3 days ago. Because i had not logged out of my X session in between, i picked up the new X server only today. dwm does something very wrong to it, causing it to consume a lot of cpu (say 25-50% according to top with 3s interval) and m

Re: [dev] [OT]: Go programming language

2009-11-15 Thread Benoit T
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 06:29:01AM +0100, Uriel wrote: > Go is the only hope for the future of the software industry, the only > weapon with a chance of killing the abominable mutant monster of C++ > and the double-headed zombie of Java/C#. hear hear! there has to be a better way :) > Having Go,

Re: [dev] [OT] SLOC-counters, take this!

2009-09-11 Thread Benoit T
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 09:43:25AM +0200, Antoni Grzymala wrote: > All the mad SLOC-counters, see this: > > http://pouet.net/prod.php?which=53816 greatness in 256 bytes :) included asm source file is 256 lines with comments that do not even look artificial. now that's taste. > (No, it doesn't ru

Re: [dev] A lightwieight and working typesetting system.

2009-09-02 Thread Benoit T
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 01:56:38PM +0200, QUINTIN Guillaume wrote: > Hi, > > Do you guys know a (working) typesetting system other than latex ? After years of WYSIWIG and a good deal of Latex (and unconvincing attemps at WYSIWIG Latex, i.e. Lyx, and useless Latex IDEs that bring nothing over vim/