Re: [dev] which minimal os

2011-02-17 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:22 AM, John Matthewman wrote: > On 2/17/11, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > >> Funny how people can't answer to simple feedback these days. I was >> looking for experience sharing but it seems this ml was the wrong >> place. >> >>

Re: [dev] which minimal os

2011-02-17 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: > On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote: >> What would you choose for a really minimal OS? > > Just to answer OP's question, CRUX is what you want. Minimalism at its > best, easy packaging, clean and

Re: [dev] which minimal os

2011-02-16 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:30 AM, Michael Farnbach wrote: > Except in this thread, because, well, the original post was inviting a > distro war, wasn't it? It wasn't. Asking for feedback isn't asking for a troll. Some may forgot that. - benoît.

Re: [dev] which minimal os

2011-02-14 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Pierre Chapuis wrote: > On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 09:06:38 +0100, Benoit Chesneau > wrote: > >> Archlinux could be good, I used it in the past, but for sure I'm not >> sure I want to use it again. Mostly due to some members of the french >

Re: [dev] which minimal os

2011-02-12 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 6:47 AM, Patrick Haller <201009-suckl...@haller.ws> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 07:34:48PM +0100, Benoit Chesneau wrote: >> >> What would you choose for a really minimal OS? > > arch linux, rolling binary releases reduce maintenance time. >

Re: [dev] which minimal os

2011-02-11 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:26 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote: > in the end, it doesn't matter which one you run, because you are using > wmii, and nothing will ever work correctly anyway.  switch to a > maintained window manager and then worry about which bloated pile of > unreliable garbage you'd like t

Re: [dev] which minimal os

2011-02-11 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Jacob Todd wrote: > Just pick a unix and drawterm to a plan 9 box. That what I want to do in coming days, having a minimal unix to do my work and use remote resources. Just need to choose one :) About that is there any good resource to learn plan9 ? - benoit

Re: [dev] which minimal os

2011-02-11 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Sean Howard wrote: > I use OpenBSD. It can grow quickly if you want it to, and it can be > run on a VAX if you want it to. > > What performance need do you have that makes OpenBSD not worth it? > > When I am going to be throwing a system together without OpenBSD th

[dev] which minimal os

2011-02-11 Thread Benoit Chesneau
Hi all, I've started these days to use wmii on ubuntu, previously I was using cwm on openbsd,but for some technical reason (smp, & performance need) I need to choose another OS. I would like to use this weekend to rethink my system and remove most of the tools i don't need but I'm undecided. What