On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 03:43:31PM -0400, fo...@dnmx.org wrote:
> I love such tools.. Is it possible to make something console-based?
Most terminal emulators (I think?) already have some option to
dump the screen content into some image format. If not, I don't
think it'd be difficult feature to ad
Agreed.
Jeez, man! I'm answering to s many e-mails at once, that I might as well
write a script for downloading, `sed`-ing the e-mail, answering to it and
copying it, then pasting it deleting garbage..
Jokes aside, what the fuck did you start, Nikida? ;P
> > Joking aside, this case you're
I cannot believe that a lot of you still use the clear-net as it is!
Instead of depending on it's limits, do yourself a favor and learn how to use
I2P(https://i2pd.website) or at least Tor/Tor Browser
(https://torproject.org)
> On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 11:56:58 +0300
> Sergey Matveev wrote:
>
> > >I di
I feel the same way.
Even the scrollback patched into St doesn't seem right (unless there's some
other patch, I don't remember).
Tmux fixes that, and.. well.. I prefer using Tmux, and it's pre-installed on
OpenBSD, so what the hell?
multiple cut-n-paste buffers? Could be one of more important thin
Well.. althought I absolutely love anonymity and freedom (of speech and in
generaL), bots and especially A.I. do have me concerned.. and I'm someone who
wants I2P and Yggdrasil or some combination of that/something similar to be
internet 2.0... so problems like that would exponantially rise.
My on
> > I take a practical approach. I use simple programs when
> > they do the job well, and more complex programs when
> > they get the job done better. Sometimes a simple program
> > can be useful for certain jobs, such as ones involving
> > shell scripting, whereas a complex program may be more
> >
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to share some small X11 utilities that I've developed and have
> been using in my daily setup. The utilities are all fairly small in
> size and requires only typical X libraries.
>
> sxcs
>
>
> This is a simple color picker and magnifier. My issue with all other
> existi
Whoah, that sounds really amazing!
I'm glad you list SLOC and depends :)
Althought there's 'xgrab' I think that grabs a RGB color code from screen,
and
is suckless, I remember reviewing it's source code like a year ago.
I love such tools.. Is it possible to make, since you seem to be within the
s
> On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 4:31PM Fernando
wrote:
> > I am looking for a graphics editor that can:
> > *use color
> > *can draw basic lines and shapes
> > *easy to build (like suckless programs)
>
> As far as easy to build, I've built grafx2 (
> http://pulkomandy.tk/projects/GrafX2 ) and LodePaint
Neither azpainter not mtpaint are suckless.
I don't really consider GTK to be suckless (unless it is), for mtpaint
And I'm looking at wc -l of all src/ mlk/ files and it's A LT of lines.
I used Tux in the past.. it does SOME very limited jobs, done.
not sure if it can be used for banners and
On 7/5/23 16:53, Dave Blanchard wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 11:55:59 +0300
Sergey Matveev wrote:
*** s...@plunder.tech [2023-07-04 19:37]:
I use ST without any patching, and have done so for years. It is very fast and
works flawlessly in my experience. All the other terminals have serious iss
So, a lot of people have weighed in on this one email.
So much so that it's taken up about my screen space in replies.
I've decided to jump in with my own two cents, because why not.
It's a fun question to chew on.
I use minimal software because I find it fun to hack software,
and I find peace of
I notice a change in xprop if I run:
xdotool search --name "André Desgualdo Pereira.odt - OpenOffice Writer"
set_window --name "André Desgualdo Pereira.odt - OpenOffice Writer"
First, after renaming it (to exactly the same name xprop gives), the name shows
just fine on dwmstatus (and also on wm
I tried to respond to the original question the other day but
failed to set up text mode correctly. ugh.
> What would be the point of using minimalist software if
> bloated and excessively complex programs completely satisfy
> all my needs?
I think there are a couple of reasons. Not all of them a
On 23/07/04 07:06PM, Nikita Krasnov wrote:
> If I had used one of the bloated programs I probably could have found a
> solution in one of the menus after reading few Stack Overflow answers. But
> with Neovim I'd have to first find the program that would be suitable for
> what I try to achieve, then
On 23/07/04 07:06PM, Nikita Krasnov wrote:
> What would be the point of using minimalist software if bloated and
> excessively complex programs completely satisfy all my needs?
Doing all that but with much less resources (in the broadest sense) wasted.
On 23/07/04 01:16PM, Dave Blanchard wrote:
16 matches
Mail list logo
