I wonder whether filesystems could be more layered. You can already do this to
some extent with LUKS and LVM on Linux, but could you go further? Rather than
having a big monolithic filesystem like ext4, could you run some simpler
filesystem that just did journaling, then on top of that one that
On 24 June 2023 7:13:48 am NZST, fo...@dnmx.org wrote:
>I understand what you are talking about... I once told someone "go kill
>yourself" or "I you die", never again..
>
>I do understand that there are sensitive souls out there, but they are
>coal of
>a fire which gets started by governments and c
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 12:08:42PM +0200, Sagar Acharya wrote:
> > Which are the filesystems which suckless recommends?
> >
> > In my view, simple ones are FAT32, ext2.
> >
> > I think journaling is required which I see as within disk backup. A
robust and easy fsck like program which corrects err
> Greetings fossy and friends,
>
> Please consider reading the ancient RFC1855 on Netiquitte and saving it
> to your bookmarks. Many great ideas that should be obvious have been
> forgotten thanks to the profit-driven anti-privacy Zeitgeist.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1855.html
>
> On May 21, 2023 4:19:06 PM UTC, fo...@dnmx.org wrote:
> >> Not sure I understand this correctly, but I think it's similar to what I
> >> wanted to add to the thread; let me phrase it differently: abusing the
> >> free speech argument to justify tone and style is just as harmful as
> >> (self-)cen
Sagar Acharya wrote:
> Which are the filesystems which suckless recommends?
>
> In my view, simple ones are FAT32, ext2.
>
> I think journaling is required which I see as within disk backup. A robust
> and easy fsck like program which corrects errors easily. And a program which
> periodically