On Sat, 6 May 2023 10:56:23 +0200
Страхиња Радић wrote:
> [1]: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html
> [2]: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/philosophy.html
> [3]: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html
> [4]: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/rms-why-gplv3.html
Thank you for your very
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 09:05:39AM +0100, Ray Garner wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've been using suckless tools such as dwm and st for a while now and
> think theyre great, my question is to do with software licenses.
>
> I'm curious about licensing and was wondering why suckless tools are
> released under M
On 23/05/05 08:07AM, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> I try to take a balanced stance in the GPL vs. MIT discussion, given it
> usually derails into tribalist diatribes on both sides.
Essays have been written and are available online explaining everything about
GPL and related licenses, so there's no need
