I had checked suckless.org on https://www.hardenize.com/, which report
`TLS, No support for STARTTLS`, but on checktls.com or testtls.com,
suckless.org is fine.
On 09.04.23 13:47, Quentin Rameau wrote:
>
> No, suckless.org MX configuration hasn't changed since last April (2022).
>
> Also, you ca
Hi again,
> > they are not enforcing tls, since mx.suckless.org supported tls before,
> > according to their log, last time mx.suckless.org has tls on
> > 2023-02-06, so they use the cache for the following email delivery, but
> > out of a sudden, mx.suckless.org downgrade to non tls, so email fai
On April 9, 2023 11:47:33 AM UTC, Quentin Rameau wrote:
>Hi PFX,
>
>> I am using the wrong words "not properly configured", what I mean is,
>> since mx.suckless.org supported tls connection before, but right now
>> mx.suckless.org downgraded to non tls, is this deliberately to be doing
>> so?
>
>T
Hi PFX,
> I am using the wrong words "not properly configured", what I mean is,
> since mx.suckless.org supported tls connection before, but right now
> mx.suckless.org downgraded to non tls, is this deliberately to be doing
> so?
Thanks for the info!
> they are not enforcing tls, since mx.suckl
On Sat, Apr 08, 2023 at 11:02:56PM +0200, Storkman wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 08, 2023 at 04:28:15PM +0200, p...@mailbox.org wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I bind keyboard shortcut to launch dmenu_extended[1] in dwm, what works
> > flawlessly before the `Use sigaction(SA_NOCLDWAIT) for SIGCHLD
> > h
