Greetings comrades,
currently we are at brcon2022 in Belgrade, smoking meats and having fun.
We decided to make it real:
http://www.zuccless.org
Come and join the future of meat!
Sincerely,
Christoph Lohmann
Please activate Javascript to see the full signature.
On Wed, 20 Jul 2022 12:23:01 +
Tom Schwindl wrote:
Dear Tom,
> I've noticed that we use the non-standard ranlib(1) program to create
> symbol tables for archives created by ar(1). This affects, as far as
> I can tell, every creation of static libraries we have.
>
> ranlib(1) is, in fact, le
On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 23:06:49 +
Tom Schwindl wrote:
Dear Tom,
> If a system says it's POSIX compliant, we can assume that the `-s'
> option exists, but there is no standard which tells us whether
> ranlib(1) is available or not.
while I agree with your point in general, keep in mind that the
On Wed, 20 Jul 2022 12:23:01 +
Tom Schwindl wrote:
Dear Tom,
> I've noticed that we use the non-standard ranlib(1) program to create
> symbol tables for archives created by ar(1). This affects, as far as
> I can tell, every creation of static libraries we have.
>
> ranlib(1) is, in fact, le
On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 23:06:49 +
Tom Schwindl wrote:
Dear Tom,
> If a system says it's POSIX compliant, we can assume that the `-s'
> option exists, but there is no standard which tells us whether
> ranlib(1) is available or not.
while I agree with your point in general, keep in mind that the
