On Sat, 1 Jan 2022 23:30:39 +0100
Ralph Eastwood wrote:
Dear Ralph,
> Those are both useful suggestions! Thank you!
you're very welcome! :)
With best regards
Laslo
Hi Laslo and Mattias,
On Sat, 1 Jan 2022 at 19:05, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> If you think about it, a better approach in this case would be to pack
> these things into a static library (which is basically a collection of
> object files). So you would have a target
On Sat, 1 Jan 2022 at 20:10, Matti
.POSIX:
CC = c99
# Required as POSIX doesn't mandate that it is defined by default
OBJ =\
alpha.o\
beta.o\
gamma.o
LINUX_AMD64_OBJ = $(OBJ:.o=.linux-amd64-o)
OPENBSD_AMD64_OBJ = $(OBJ:.o=.openbsd-amd64-o)
all: myproj-linux-amd64 myproj-openbsd-amd64
myproj-linux-amd64:
On Sat, 1 Jan 2022 17:03:41 +0100
Ralph Eastwood wrote:
Dear Ralph,
> Thanks for pointing out that technique, I've utilised it in the past
> and it's a shame that it's not more well-known... I've seen many a
> GNUism in its place...
yeah, it makes a lot of sense and is nice and simple.
> The i
Hi Laslo,
> and then in config.mk have a variable
>
>TARGET = arm
>
> and then in the Makefile have a line
>
>include target/$TARGET.mk
Thanks for pointing out that technique, I've utilised it in the past and
it's a shame that it's not more well-known... I've seen many a GNUism
in its pla
On Sat, 1 Jan 2022 14:08:24 +0100
Ralph Eastwood wrote:
Dear Ralph,
> So... makellint? :D
> I like it; it seems 'makel' is unused as a project name.
and even if, it's not like names are reserved. When some 13-year-old
kid dumps some Rust-crap with a name on GitHub I wouldn't see it as
reserved.
Hi Mattias,
Happy New Year!
> But I also like makel, but I will give it some more though before I
rename it a second time.
So... makellint? :D
I like it; it seems 'makel' is unused as a project name.
Are there any suggestions for handling out-of-source builds using
POSIX makefiles? I recently
On Sat, 1 Jan 2022 13:22:48 +0100
Mattias Andrée wrote:
Dear Mattias,
> libzahl is my only project with a German name, and it's was called
> libzahl because the bold Z used represent the integers stands for
> Zahl, but I do have projects with names in different languages (I
> also have libskrift
On Sat, 1 Jan 2022 13:01:05 +0100
Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Jan 2022 10:33:22 +0100
> Mattias Andrée wrote:
>
> Dear Mattias,
>
> first off, happy new year to all of you!
>
> > Thanks for pointing that it, I didn't find it in my search.
> > I renamed it to mklint.
>
> This is also c
> I'd definitely be interested in such a tool. Weather it be in form of
> a make implementation or linter doesn't matter a whole lot to me as
> long as the end goal of having a tool to help write portable makefile
> is achieved.
This is my take, too --- I'd get plenty of use out of either version,
On Sat, 1 Jan 2022 10:33:22 +0100
Mattias Andrée wrote:
Dear Mattias,
first off, happy new year to all of you!
> Thanks for pointing that it, I didn't find it in my search.
> I renamed it to mklint.
This is also confusing as mk(1) by plan9 exists, but you explicitly
target POSIX make(1).
make
Thanks for pointing that it, I didn't find it in my search.
I renamed it to mklint.
Regards,
Mattias Andrée
On Sat, 1 Jan 2022 14:43:15 +0600
NRK wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 11:29:11PM +0100, Mattias Andrée wrote:
> > I just started implementing a linter[0]. Even though I just
> > starte
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 11:29:11PM +0100, Mattias Andrée wrote:
> I just started implementing a linter[0]. Even though I just
> started it today, I think that's enough for this year.
>
> Happy New Year!
> Mattias Andrée
>
> [0] https://github.com/maandree/makelint/
Thank you very much, I'll keep
13 matches
Mail list logo