I just started implementing a linter[0]. Even though I just
started it today, I think that's enough for this year.
Happy New Year!
Mattias Andrée
[0] https://github.com/maandree/makelint/
On Thu, 30 Dec 2021 21:17:32 +0100
Mattias Andrée wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Dec 2021 21:07:06 +0100
> Laslo Hun
On 2021-12-30, NRK wrote:
> Hmm, I was under the impression that `?=` was accepted into POSIX. But I
> cannot find any mention of it in the posix manpage (man 1p make) so I
> guess I was wrong.
It is accepted for the upcoming POSIX issue 8:
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=330
On Fri, 31 Dec 2021 12:53:59 +0100
crae...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Yeah you make a strong argument. I too think a linting tool would be
> > useful. I imagine it would function like shellcheck does for shells. If
> > nothing else it would really help people identify GNU extensions vs
> > portable beha
> Yeah you make a strong argument. I too think a linting tool would be
> useful. I imagine it would function like shellcheck does for shells. If
> nothing else it would really help people identify GNU extensions vs
> portable behavior.
Something like shellcheck would be awesome! Given that the POSI
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 11:33:21AM +0100, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Dec 2021 11:16:18 +0100
> Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
>
> Dear Hiltjo,
>
> > In my opinion a practical way is to really test it on different
> > systems (bleeding edge Linux, older Debian stable, NetBSD, OpenBSD)
> > and GNU/
On Fri, 31 Dec 2021 11:16:18 +0100
Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
Dear Hiltjo,
> In my opinion a practical way is to really test it on different
> systems (bleeding edge Linux, older Debian stable, NetBSD, OpenBSD)
> and GNU/Make, different BSD make programs.
>
> This doesn't cover the POSIX compatibil
On Fri, 31 Dec 2021 01:52:42 -0800
Arthur Williams wrote:
Dear Arthur,
> I too fell victim to the GNU trap and thought "?=" was standard and
> actually useful.
hehe this thread here feels like a self-help-thread of the newly
POSIX-make-awakened!
> Completely forgot about the -e flag. Now I nee
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 01:52:42AM -0800, Arthur Williams wrote:
> I too fell victim to the GNU trap and thought "?=" was standard and
> actually useful.
>
> > and want to "dynamically" override it (e.g. in a build system context)
> > when the environment already specifies PREFIX, you either do
>
I too fell victim to the GNU trap and thought "?=" was standard and
actually useful.
> and want to "dynamically" override it (e.g. in a build system context)
> when the environment already specifies PREFIX, you either do
>
>make -e
Completely forgot about the -e flag. Now I need to go update
On Fri, 31 Dec 2021 12:49:46 +0600
NRK wrote:
Dear NRK,
> Hmm, I was under the impression that `?=` was accepted into POSIX.
> But I cannot find any mention of it in the posix manpage (man 1p
> make) so I guess I was wrong.
>
> What would be a posix replacement for `?=` ? I assume something lik
10 matches
Mail list logo
