* Markus Wichmann [2021-10-14 20:24]:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 12:28:52PM -0400, Greg Reagle wrote:
FYI
Useful, but a lot of wasted screen space on my monitor:
man dwm
MUCH better! I see the entire man page:
tcvt -c 4 man dwm
You know, if you were trying to shill the program, you m
On 21/10/15 07:03, Martin Tournoij wrote:
> Note that mandoc has a default of 78 if not set; GNU man (and maybe some
> others?) do indeed take up the full width by default, but mandoc won't take up
> more than 78.
I've mostly used GNU man, and from my briefly trying other versions of man I
didn't
On 21/10/15 06:23AM, Greg Reagle wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021, at 9:56 PM, Rudy Dellomas (dther) wrote:
> > [...]
> > `tmux new ';' splitw -h man dwm`
>
> No, this does not do what tcvt does. Have you actually tried it? Nor does
> the MANWIDTH variable.
>
You're right, sorry, my mistake. I r
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021, at 9:56 PM, Rudy Dellomas (dther) wrote:
> `tcvt` is a python terminal multiplexer, which is a bit excessive for the
> purpose of saving terminal columns. Even forgoing that GNU man has
> $MANWIDTH, why not just use vertical split tmux? It's faster (written in
> C) and is much
buzzard.2 is a classic: https://www.ioccc.org/years.html#1992
Despite being an entry to a competition, the code itself is actually
barely obfuscated, just very terse, and it comes with pretty good
design docs.
Stack machines and forth are rather good in general. I started by
reading https://users.
On Thu Oct 14, 2021 at 9:56 PM EDT, Rudy Dellomas (dther) wrote:
> [...] why not just use vertical split tmux? It's faster (written in
> C) and is much more versatile. This would do more or less the same:
>
> `tmux new ';' splitw -h man dwm`
For me, this command splits into two shells, only one of
