[dev] [PATCH] Launch scroll program with the default shell

2020-04-11 Thread Quentin Rameau
--- st.c | 9 ++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/st.c b/st.c index e51fe15..afe82eb 100644 --- a/st.c +++ b/st.c @@ -689,9 +689,12 @@ execsh(char *cmd, char **args) if (args) { prog = args[0]; arg = NULL; - } else i

[dev] [PATCH] Launch scroll program with the default shell

2020-04-11 Thread Quentin Rameau
--- st.c | 12 +++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/st.c b/st.c index e51fe15..fcfbb1a 100644 --- a/st.c +++ b/st.c @@ -689,14 +689,16 @@ execsh(char *cmd, char **args) if (args) { prog = args[0]; arg = NULL; - } e

[dev] [PATCH 0/1] Small fix for scroll integration

2020-04-11 Thread Quentin Rameau
I'm not sure where we should fix that, either here, in the caller, or put a default program in the scroll tool. I think it's better in the caller as we already push utmp to it if it exists. What do you think? Quentin Rameau (1): Launch scroll program with the default shell st.c | 9 ++---

[dev] [PATCH 1/1] Launch scroll program with the default shell

2020-04-11 Thread Quentin Rameau
--- st.c | 9 ++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/st.c b/st.c index e51fe15..afe82eb 100644 --- a/st.c +++ b/st.c @@ -689,9 +689,12 @@ execsh(char *cmd, char **args) if (args) { prog = args[0]; arg = NULL; - } else i

Re: [dev][st] Several patches

2020-04-11 Thread k0ga
Hi, The patchset again with small differencies and a few additions. Regards, >From 15608429bf80283f2edaf8bed04fb71e986b0123 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Roberto E. Vargas Caballero" Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 11:52:58 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 5/6] Update FAQ with the last odifications --- FAQ | 12

[dev] Patches for st

2020-04-11 Thread Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
Hi, I attach several patches for st (sorry, for different reasons i cannot use git-send-email). Regards, >From d18c3a8c9eb82b2d135f4feb44060e6adb29428e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Roberto E. Vargas Caballero" Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 22:26:12 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 3/4] Fix style issue --- st

[dev] [st] X missing terminfo entry

2020-04-11 Thread Tianlin Qu
Hi, Whilst working on a TUI, I noticed that whilst scrolling, my application produced display artifacts. I found that this was due to my changing TERM from "xterm" to "st", which is missing the reverse scrolling capability that st actually supports. tldr; append the following entry to st.info rin