Re: [dev] [dwm] Crash (possibly related to ru_bottomstack?) no actually problem is attachabove

2020-02-25 Thread TRS-80
OK, after yet more testing, I am pretty sure I have vindicated ru_bottomstack. I now think the culprit is actually attachabove, based on the following extended testing: |---+---++-| | # | patch(es) | res

Re: [dev] [dwm] Crash (possibly related to ru_bottomstack?)

2020-02-25 Thread TRS-80
On 2020-02-25 07:17, Daniel Moch wrote: On Feb 24, 2020, at 4:49 PM, TRS-80 wrote: If I am recalling correctly, it seems this only started happening once I incorporated the ru_bottomstack patch. I cannot right now swear that is the problem, it just seems that way at the moment. I guess one (eas

Re: [dev] user interfaces on top of ii

2020-02-25 Thread Greg Reagle
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020, at 11:54, Evan Gates wrote: > I had no idea anyone actually used pcw. I feel like I should warn you > that I wrote that code a long time ago and it is most likely complete > shit. Awesome that it seems to work for you though! It works great for me. I have called (executed)

Re: [dev] an approach to Matrix client that sucks less

2020-02-25 Thread Laslo Hunhold
On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 15:33:25 -0500 "Greg Reagle" wrote: Dear Greg, > Thank you Laslo Hunhold for your feedback. sure, happy to give it! :) > Based on your other comments, I assume that when you stress the > importance of the "interface", you are not referring to end-user > interface (like comm

Re: [dev] [dwm] Crash (possibly related to ru_bottomstack?)

2020-02-25 Thread Daniel Moch
On Feb 24, 2020, at 4:49 PM, TRS-80 wrote: > If I am recalling correctly, it seems this only started happening once > I incorporated the ru_bottomstack patch. I cannot right now swear that > is the problem, it just seems that way at the moment. I guess one > (easy) way to find out... And does i