On Sat, Dec 07, 2019 at 03:50:09AM +, sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
> I did fool around with your patch and the dejavu font: when I forced the
> pixel size I got those gaps. Not to mention the anti-aliasing seems to be
> involved.
I don't understand how it would be possible to have the gap
dunno what the issue may be but i use a
fairly default config.h so i doubt it's st
On 12/7/19 4:46 AM, sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 08:01:41PM +0200, anigger@national.shitposting.agency
wrote:
but i use liberation mono.
I gave a shot at liberation mono and noto m
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 08:01:41PM +0200, anigger@national.shitposting.agency
wrote:
> but i use liberation mono.
I gave a shot at liberation mono and noto mono. Both have still issues at
various scales. The best rendering seems from liberation mono, my version of
noto is quite old though.
I am
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 10:55:27AM -0800, Eric Pruitt wrote:
> I've had this same problem since I upgraded to Debian 10. I believe this
> is due to changes in character bounding box sizes because you can fix
> this by adjusting cwscale and chscale. On my systems, I only have
> vertical gaps, and se
On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 06:19:16PM +, sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
> I know I am walking on eggs: it seems st monospace font rendering with
> freetype
> (I use dejavu mono) has some vertical and/or horizontal gaps (whatever the
> rendering size).
>
> To illustrate, with lynx web browser:
Could it be your fonts.conf (or similar)?
The box looks fine to me (+ - | :S).
I haven't noticed anything unusual
but i use liberation mono.
On 12/5/19 8:19 PM, sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I know I am walking on eggs: it seems st monospace font rendering with freetype
(I use dejavu
