On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 21:33:03 +0200
Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
Dear Hiltjo,
> > Thanks for the insight! I was thinking about using quark instead of
> > OpenBSD's httpd, because it simpler to use and probably even more
> > secure. I think ~1000 requests/second is still plenty for all my
> > projects,
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 19:58:01 +0200
maillists.rul...@mailbox.org wrote:
Dear Richard,
> Thanks for your assessments! I think you've hit the nail on the head.
> I got my initial test results on an OpenBSD machine. I tested the
> golang server and quark again on a Linux machine today and the
> diffe
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 21:16:05 +0200
Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
Dear Hiltjo,
> Sorry to go a bit off-topic here, but I quickly tested and reviewed
> the CGI patch. This CGI patch is broken. A basic `quark -h 127.0.0.1
> -p 8080` serving some page always returns HTTP 400 "Bad request".
>
> A few bound
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:17:09 -0700
Anselm Garbe wrote:
Dear Anselm,
> The issue is, there are enough http servers, but most of them are
> designed as daemons. As you say, quark could become a nice alternative
> for drop-in purporses. For this it is currently too feature rich
> however. I would s
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 10:58:29AM +0200, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 13:07:47 -0700
> Anselm Garbe wrote:
>
> Dear Anselm, Dear Richard,
>
> > Thanks for doing that and letting me know. So the reason you see this
> > performance penalty in contrast to the other web servers you me
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 07:58:01PM +0200, maillists.rul...@mailbox.org wrote:
> Hi Laslo and Anselm,
>
> Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 13:07:47 -0700
> > Anselm Garbe wrote:
> > > Thanks for doing that and letting me know. So the reason you see this
> > > performance penalty in co
Hi Laslo,
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 02:02, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> Quark is actually very lean and offers 99% of the features you would
> expect for a static server. I personally am a big fan of OpenBSD's
> httpd and will use it on the server I am currently setting up.
>
> I see quark's role more lik
Hi Laslo and Anselm,
Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 13:07:47 -0700
> Anselm Garbe wrote:
> > Thanks for doing that and letting me know. So the reason you see this
> > performance penalty in contrast to the other web servers you mention
> > is, that quark is a fork() based web server
On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 13:07:47 -0700
Anselm Garbe wrote:
Dear Anselm, Dear Richard,
> Thanks for doing that and letting me know. So the reason you see this
> performance penalty in contrast to the other web servers you mention
> is, that quark is a fork() based web server (and current HEAD is stil
