On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 at 12:50, Richard Ulmer
wrote:
> I checked the performance of revision
> 22b5b3cfa6b28f8e0c6c35c04ad9b4cb609b5643 like this:
>
> echo 'foo bar' > index.html
> doas quark > /dev/null &
> ab -n 1 -c 20 'http://localhost:8083/'
>
> And I got 942 requests/second, so I'd say the
Hi Anselm,
I checked the performance of revision
22b5b3cfa6b28f8e0c6c35c04ad9b4cb609b5643 like this:
echo 'foo bar' > index.html
doas quark > /dev/null &
ab -n 1 -c 20 'http://localhost:8083/'
And I got 942 requests/second, so I'd say there is no significant
difference to the current version
Hi Richard,
On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 at 11:34, wrote:
> I'm toying with quark and noticed it's comparatively poor performance in
> my use case. I used Apache bench to benchmark the web server. With this
> setup I got 980 requests/second:
Out of curiosity, can you do me a favour and check a very old r
Hi,
I'm toying with quark and noticed it's comparatively poor performance in
my use case. I used Apache bench to benchmark the web server. With this
setup I got 980 requests/second:
echo 'foo bar' > index.html
doas quark -d . -h localhost -p 8080 > /dev/null &
ab -n 1 -c 20 'http://localhost:8
