On Sat, 15 Jun 2019 22:11:13 +0200
Wolf wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On , Mattias Andrée wrote:
> > Wouldn't it just complicate matters if you needed to specify whether a
> > number is an integer or a real value;
>
> Could you not just consider sequence of [0-9]+ to be an integer and
> anything with o
Hello,
On , Mattias Andrée wrote:
> Wouldn't it just complicate matters if you needed to specify whether a
> number is an integer or a real value;
Could you not just consider sequence of [0-9]+ to be an integer and
anything with other characters either invalid or float? Not sure, I'm in
no means
`long double` is able to exactly represent all values exactly
representable in `uint64_t`, `int64_t` and `double` (big float
can be used for other languages). Wouldn't it just complicate
matters if you needed to specify whether a number is an integer
or a real value; if there is any need for it, th
On , sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
> json almost deserves a promotion to suckless format.
Except for not putting any limits on sizes of integers. I think it would
be better to have size the implementation must support to be json
complient. And also having separate int and float types. Because
