Re: [dev] freetype2/fc pain

2018-10-19 Thread AR Garbe
On Fri, 19 Oct 2018 at 07:04, David Demelier wrote: > Le 23/09/2018 à 06:10, AR Garbe a écrit : > > Back in the days I also concluded that the introduction of Xinerama > > and multihead support was a bad idea after all. > > > > I'm really at a point to consider forking dwm and dmenu to simply rely

Re: [dev] freetype2/fc pain

2018-10-19 Thread AR Garbe
Hi David, On Fri, 19 Oct 2018 at 05:47, David Demelier wrote: > Le 24/09/2018 à 08:19, AR Garbe a écrit : > > On 23 September 2018 at 11:56, Eric Pruitt wrote: > >> On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 09:14:11AM -0700, AR Garbe wrote: > >>> I totally agree. I'd be in favour in a st just using plain X fonts.

Re: [dev] freetype2/fc pain

2018-10-19 Thread David Demelier
Le 23/09/2018 à 06:10, AR Garbe a écrit : Back in the days I also concluded that the introduction of Xinerama and multihead support was a bad idea after all. I'm really at a point to consider forking dwm and dmenu to simply rely on X11 as it used to be, perhaps with going the extra mile to remov

Re: [dev] freetype2/fc pain

2018-10-19 Thread sylvain . bertrand
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 02:45:58PM +0200, David Demelier wrote: > Unfortunately, I remember having terminus not rendering some kind of unicode > characters not even emojis. I think it was some drawing characters. If those "characters" are actually using "combined" unicode rendering, namely using m

Re: [dev] freetype2/fc pain

2018-10-19 Thread David Demelier
Le 24/09/2018 à 08:19, AR Garbe a écrit : On 23 September 2018 at 11:56, Eric Pruitt wrote: On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 09:14:11AM -0700, AR Garbe wrote: I totally agree. I'd be in favour in a st just using plain X fonts. This emoji unicode porn and anti-aliasing TTF support doesn't make sense to