Re: [dev] freetype2/fc pain

On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 13:38:03 + sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Sylvain, > That's what the specs says: "extended grapheme cluster" (EGC) should > not go beyond 10 unicode points "in theory". This stream-safe thingy > seems to apply to non normalized unicode stream with it's 32 unicode >

Re: [dev] Re: diff -x

Why would you? You can just as well write a script a new directory with hard links to all files that should be included in the diff. On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 17:49:25 +0300 Adrian Grigore wrote: > In a diff -ur situation? > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 5:48 PM Adrian Grigore > wrote: > > > > How would y

[dev] diff -x

How would you implement diff -x in a POSIX compliant manner? -- Thanks, Adi

[dev] Re: diff -x

In a diff -ur situation? On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 5:48 PM Adrian Grigore wrote: > > How would you implement diff -x in a POSIX compliant manner? > > -- > Thanks, > Adi -- Thanks, Adi

Re: [dev] freetype2/fc pain

On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 11:50:11AM +0200, Laslo Hunhold wrote: > On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 02:05:20 + > sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote: > ... >> Well, there is something about stream safe unicode application. >> Basically, it is a buffer of 128 bytes (32 unicode points) with a >> continuation mar

Re: [dev] freetype2/fc pain

On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 02:05:20 + sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Sylvain, > Agreed: the "atom" would be this "extended grapheme cluster", and > from this point of view, a terminal would be a grid of "space" and > "extended grapheme". yes exactly. > Unfortunately, I am still working out