2018-01-16 21:06 GMT+01:00 Cág :
> Daniel Cegiełka wrote:
>
>> yup... and next one is bearssl
>> https://bearssl.org/
>
> What is so great about it? I only know about Libre/OpenSSL and the GNU
> implementation.
"""
Be correct and secure. In particular, insecure protocol versions and
choices of alg
k.suzaki wrote:
> I want to know why another libc is bad (or good?) to build stali.
> I guess it resembles to Harden Gentoo which allows to build uclib and musl.
>https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Hardened_uClibc
>https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Hardened_musl
Please see the compa
Daniel Cegiełka wrote:
> > musl is the only alternative, fairly feature complete, libc, that is still
> > being developed. uClibc/dietlibc haven't been around for many years
> https://cgit.openadk.org/cgi/cgit/uclibc-ng.git/log/
Forgot about it. Anyway it doesn't see that much activity comparing
