Re: [dev] Can I build stali with another libc?

2018-01-11 Thread k.suzaki
On 2018/01/12 5:03, Cág wrote: k.suzaki wrote: Can I build stali with another libc? The old stali seems to be built by uClibc. You can but you shouldn't. musl is the only alternative, fairly feature complete, libc, that is still being developed. uClibc/dietlibc haven't been around for many y

Re: [dev] Can I build stali with another libc?

2018-01-11 Thread Daniel Cegiełka
2018-01-11 21:03 GMT+01:00 Cág : > > k.suzaki wrote: > > > Dear, > > Can I build stali with another libc? The old stali seems to be built by > > uClibc. > > You can but you shouldn't. > > musl is the only alternative, fairly feature complete, libc, that is still > being developed. uClibc/dietlibc h

Re: [dev] Can I build stali with another libc?

2018-01-11 Thread Cág
k.suzaki wrote: > Dear, > Can I build stali with another libc? The old stali seems to be built by > uClibc. You can but you shouldn't. musl is the only alternative, fairly feature complete, libc, that is still being developed. uClibc/dietlibc haven't been around for many years, newlib is closely

Re: [dev] Are all dlopen() functions in the stali suppressed?

2018-01-11 Thread Cág
k.suzaki wrote: > I see. > The two ELF binaries of "ip and "debugfs" which include symbol may > say "Dynamic loading not supported". Obviously, the programmes you mentioned are third-party. If I understand correctly, the goal was to make the base userland statically linked (shell + sbase + ubase

Re: [dev] Can I build stali with another libc?

2018-01-11 Thread Anselm Garbe
On 11 January 2018 at 07:03, k.suz...@aist.go.jp wrote: > Can I build stali with another libc? The old stali seems to be built by > uClibc. > https://chemnitzer.linux-tage.de/2010/vortraege/shortpaper/308_stali.pdf > https://dl.suckless.org/stali/clt2010/stali.html > Should I use old stali sourc

Re: [dev] Can I build stali with another libc?

2018-01-11 Thread lukáš Hozda
Glibc is one big gnu ew, no wonder there are issues. Still, what exactly is wrong? Do you need to use glibc in particular? 2018-01-11 16:30 GMT+01:00 lukáš Hozda : > Glibc is one big gnu ew, no wonder there are issues. Still, what exactly is > wrong? Do you need to use glibc in particular? > > Dne

[dev] Can I build stali with another libc?

2018-01-11 Thread k.suz...@aist.go.jp
Dear, Can I build stali with another libc? The old stali seems to be built by uClibc. https://chemnitzer.linux-tage.de/2010/vortraege/shortpaper/308_stali.pdf   https://dl.suckless.org/stali/clt2010/stali.html Should I use old stali source code?   https://git.sta.li/src.old/ P.S. I just tried

Re: [dev] Are all dlopen() functions in the stali suppressed?

2018-01-11 Thread k.suzaki
On 2018/01/10 22:20, Daniel Cegiełka wrote: 2018-01-10 4:22 GMT+01:00 k.suzaki : On 2018/01/09 17:10, k.suzaki wrote: On 2018/01/09 15:49, Daniel Cegiełka wrote: 2018-01-09 3:22 GMT+01:00 k.suzaki : Dear, I found some dlopen() functions in the stali source code. I guess they are obstacle of