I did check alpine package web browsers: it's full of libgcc_s deps.
You can forget alpine as a no libgcc_s distro. At least, they do maintain the
patches required in order to compile many software packages with the musl
libc.
Regards,
--
Sylvain
On 4 July 2017 at 00:36, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> On 4 July 2017 at 00:06, Michael Forney wrote:
>> I noticed that git.suckless.org is no longer accepting connections
>> with the git protocol. HTTP still works though.
>>
>> Just pointing that out in case it wasn't a deliberate change.
>
> Nice spo
Hi Michael,
On 4 July 2017 at 00:06, Michael Forney wrote:
> I noticed that git.suckless.org is no longer accepting connections
> with the git protocol. HTTP still works though.
>
> Just pointing that out in case it wasn't a deliberate change.
Nice spot, wasn't deliberate and is caused by the se
Hi,
I noticed that git.suckless.org is no longer accepting connections
with the git protocol. HTTP still works though.
Just pointing that out in case it wasn't a deliberate change.
-Michael
On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 19:11:46 +0200
Mattias Andrée wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 18:55:42 +0200
> Laslo Hunhold wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 18:47:37 +0200
> > Mattias Andrée wrote:
> >
> > Dear Mattias,
> >
> > > Perhaps farbfeld should specify that it should use linear sRGB, right
> > > n
On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 18:55:42 +0200
Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 18:47:37 +0200
> Mattias Andrée wrote:
>
> Dear Mattias,
>
> > Perhaps farbfeld should specify that it should use linear sRGB, right
> > now it specifies sRGB, which implies non-linear. It wouldn't make
> > the format
On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 18:47:37 +0200
Mattias Andrée wrote:
Dear Mattias,
> Perhaps farbfeld should specify that it should use linear sRGB, right
> now it specifies sRGB, which implies non-linear. It wouldn't make
> the format less complicated in my opinion, but it would be easier to
> implemented e
Sylvain Bertrand wrote:
> For c++ retards and sub-humans
Delete your account.
On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 18:25:23 +0200
Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 17:28:29 +0200
> Mattias Andrée wrote:
>
> Hey Mattias,
>
> > Because if the limited number of values that can be stored in an
> > 8-bit integer and because humans don't notices small differences
> > between dark colou
On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 17:28:29 +0200
Mattias Andrée wrote:
Hey Mattias,
> Because if the limited number of values that can be stored in an
> 8-bit integer and because humans don't notices small differences
> between dark colours as well as small differences in bright
> colours, sRGB encodes colours
On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 05:33:14PM +0200, hiro wrote:
> I should, so there isn't any? I have alpine here ready and waiting...
Indeed, alpine is musl based (thx to the authors for all the patching, hope
upstream they were not *ss h*les and committed the patches).
For sane C code (or at least have
I should, so there isn't any? I have alpine here ready and waiting...
On 7/3/17, sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 02:53:30PM +0200, hiro wrote:
>> so if i'm on musl and tell gcc to link statically it should just work?
>> in that case i'll try and report.
>
> Meaning tha
Because if the limited number of values that can be stored in an
8-bit integer and because humans don't notices small differences
between dark colours as well as small differences in bright
colours, sRGB encodes colours non-linearly so there are more
bright colours and fewer dark colours.
However,
On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 02:53:30PM +0200, hiro wrote:
> so if i'm on musl and tell gcc to link statically it should just work?
> in that case i'll try and report.
Meaning that, in theory, you can have a libc which does not require libgcc_s
(coze of pthread_cancel) with musl.
Namely, you should be
so if i'm on musl and tell gcc to link statically it should just work?
in that case i'll try and report.
On 7/3/17, sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 01:45:39PM +0200, hiro wrote:
>> I have a related question. how can i statically link X11 programs
>> nowadays? Without d
On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 01:45:39PM +0200, hiro wrote:
> I have a related question. how can i statically link X11 programs
> nowadays? Without dlopen obviously...
AFAIK, you can statically link all of them... but it was a long time ago.
The real culprit for static linking is in the gnu glibc: pthr
I have a related question. how can i statically link X11 programs
nowadays? Without dlopen obviously...
17 matches
Mail list logo
