On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 08:43:59AM -0300, Alba Pompeo wrote:
> There's tinyxserver and the accompanying tinyxlib but they are kind of
> abandoned.
> I never tried it myself but if you do I'd be interested to know how it goes.
> https://github.com/idunham/tinyxserver
> https://github.com/idunham/tin
For XOrg compilation instructions/process, I'd look at CRUX's ports
[0][1]. It's at least a couple dozen ports to read through but at
least they're simple port/shell scripts.
As for Nano-X (nee, microwindows), it's an X11-like API (though not
compatible) derived from mini-X. microwindows adds a
There's tinyxserver and the accompanying tinyxlib but they are kind of
abandoned.
I never tried it myself but if you do I'd be interested to know how it goes.
https://github.com/idunham/tinyxserver
https://github.com/idunham/tinyxlib
There's also Nano-X and the accompanying nxlib but I don't know
On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 09:06:22AM +0200, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
>
> Wayland in itself actually is a very nice protocol. However, you cannot
> do much with it alone, as the compositor and everything on top (input
> handling, clipboard, keyboard-layouts, ...) have to be done by hand.
>
Can you elabo
On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 09:06:22AM +0200, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> The way they did Wayland was kind of nice, but even it lacks
> some modern ideas which should've been implemented now that the entire
> windowing system is revamped anyway, and here I'm talking about
> color management, accessibility
On Sat, 1 Jul 2017 19:51:59 -0400
Rendov Norra wrote:
Hey Rendov,
> Are there any XOrg implementations that aren't a pain to compile?
like most legacy codebases, you end up with a difficult to compile
chunk. Others might give you more insight in what to choose.
> I've heard people complain abo
