On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 11:51:18AM -0400, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> http://man.openbsd.org/crypto.3
Indeed. Still actually an internal library of openssl, not a library split from
the network code with a life of its own, as it should be.
Maybe libreSSL will do things right like gnutls on this matt
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 06:47:22PM +0200, Kamil Cholewiński wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jun 2017, sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > When people are using the word "openbsd", it does designate the kernel
> > project.
> > Not the userland projects.
>
> Completely not true. Please check your facts.
Che
On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 21:00:40 +0200
Quentin Rameau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Sounds like it says you must not write those error message if -f is
> > used. Kind of a strange requirement as `2>/dev/null` would do that.
> >
> > > I don't fully understand the wording in POSIX on the page[0].
> > >
> > >
Hi,
> Sounds like it says you must not write those error message if -f is
> used. Kind of a strange requirement as `2>/dev/null` would do that.
>
> > I don't fully understand the wording in POSIX on the page[0].
> >
> > [0]
> > http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/rm.html
“
Sounds like it says you must not write those error message if -f is used.
Kind of a strange requirement as `2>/dev/null` would do that.
On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 20:14:58 +0200
Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 02:08:24PM -0300, Marc Collin wrote:
> > Hello all.
> >
> > I found a case
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 02:08:24PM -0300, Marc Collin wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> I found a case where sbase rm command fails but doesn't output any
> error message, making it look like it succeeded.
>
> mkdir ./test
> mkdir ./test/test
> sudo chown root:root ./test
> sudo chown root:root ./test/test
Hello all.
I found a case where sbase rm command fails but doesn't output any
error message, making it look like it succeeded.
mkdir ./test
mkdir ./test/test
sudo chown root:root ./test
sudo chown root:root ./test/test
rm -rf ./test
rm won't output anything and exit (apparently) cleanly.
But the
On Fri, 16 Jun 2017, sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
> When people are using the word "openbsd", it does designate the kernel
> project.
> Not the userland projects.
Completely not true. Please check your facts.
On 16 June 2017 at 11:49, wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 02:06:30PM +0200, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 09:53:07 +
>> sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Dear Sylvain,
>>
>> > openbsd is as shitty as linux and their security thingy is just
>> > bullshit.
>>
>> are you ser
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 02:06:30PM +0200, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 09:53:07 +
> sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Dear Sylvain,
>
> > openbsd is as shitty as linux and their security thingy is just
> > bullshit.
>
> are you serious? LibreSSL is proof enough that OpenBSD
On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 09:53:07 +
sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Sylvain,
> openbsd is as shitty as linux and their security thingy is just
> bullshit.
are you serious? LibreSSL is proof enough that OpenBSD's approach is
probably the sanest for a general solution.
Not to go too OT, but
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 04:46:55PM +0200, Kamil Cholewiński wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2017, Dominykas Mostauskis
> wrote:
> software. Go install base OpenBSD on a potato, it has everything you
> choices for hacking on C, Perl or shell. It has a toolchain, and loads
openbsd is as shitty as linux an
12 matches
Mail list logo
