I fail to see how remote arbitrary code execution is a feature. Maybe
I'm missing something.
I suppose in essence it would suck less in that there'd be fewer APIs,
but you'll just get the same lazy code and bloat that most software
exhibits, but with the ease of visiting a webpage.
On 6/10/17, Lo
no
On 6/11/17, Alba Pompeo wrote:
> W3C is not the only organization working on standardization.
> Any opinion on WHATWG? Is it a little better?
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Hiltjo Posthuma
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 01:30:12PM -0700, Louis Santillan wrote:
>>> https://you
W3C is not the only organization working on standardization.
Any opinion on WHATWG? Is it a little better?
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 01:30:12PM -0700, Louis Santillan wrote:
>> https://youtu.be/1uflg7LDmzI?t=5m35s
>>
>> James Mickens call
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 01:30:12PM -0700, Louis Santillan wrote:
> https://youtu.be/1uflg7LDmzI?t=5m35s
>
> James Mickens calls it Project Atlantis.
I could not find any Project Atlantis code, do you know where to find it?
> Make the web/content developers responsible for their own rendering
> a
