Has anybody considered seif [0][1]?
I disagree with the choice of nodejs & Qt, and the idea of capturing
entropy from microphone and camera are interesting but gameable. I
think the overall concept is viable.
[0] (Repo) http://www.seif.place
[1] (Talk) https://www.oreilly.com/ideas/the-seif-proje
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 8:54 PM, ilf wrote:
> I wonder why the suckless-websites are only available in HTTP, not in HTTPS.
> In the age of letsencrypt.org, there aren't a lot of valid excuses against
> TLS. Am I missing one from a suckless-philosopy? Or has this just never been
> requested?
>
> I
Mark Mendell:
This is on my TODO list for quite some time. Expect it to happen until
end of this year.
Good to hear. Thanks a lot!
--
ilf
Über 80 Millionen Deutsche benutzen keine Konsole. Klick dich nicht weg!
-- Eine Initiative des Bundesamtes für Tastaturbenutzung
signatu
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 21:25:32 +0100
Joseph Graham wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 08:54:39PM +0200, ilf wrote:
> > I wonder why the suckless-websites are only available in HTTP, not
> > in HTTPS. In the age of letsencrypt.org, there aren't a lot of
> > valid excuses against TLS. Am I missing one
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 08:54:39PM +0200, ilf wrote:
> I wonder why the suckless-websites are only available in HTTP, not in HTTPS.
> In the age of letsencrypt.org, there aren't a lot of valid excuses against
> TLS. Am I missing one from a suckless-philosopy? Or has this just never been
> requested
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 2:54 PM, ilf wrote:
> (Pardon if it's been discussed, I did not find it in the archives.)
http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1608/30016.html
From Anselm in that thread:
> This is on my TODO list for quite some time. Expect it to happen until
> end of this year.
I wonder why the suckless-websites are only available in HTTP, not in
HTTPS. In the age of letsencrypt.org, there aren't a lot of valid
excuses against TLS. Am I missing one from a suckless-philosopy? Or has
this just never been requested?
I for one would love to see unencrypted communications
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 17:30:41 +0100
Nick Warne wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 17:11:23 +0100
> Nick Warne wrote:
>
> > Hi Jochen,
> >
> > On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 17:47:04 +0200
> > Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Nick,
> > >
> > > * Nick Warne [2016-09-24 12:50]:
> > > > To reproduce
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 17:49:00 +0100
Nick Warne wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 18:43:18 +0200
> Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
>
> > * Nick Warne [2016-09-24 17:39]:
> > > rm config.h, and it builds fine from scratch. make clean doesn't
> > > remove config.h (should it?).
> >
> > No, it should
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 18:43:18 +0200
Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> * Nick Warne [2016-09-24 17:39]:
> > rm config.h, and it builds fine from scratch. make clean doesn't
> > remove config.h (should it?).
>
> No, it should not. config.h is your own configuration and you should
> know how to update
* Nick Warne [2016-09-24 17:39]:
> rm config.h, and it builds fine from scratch. make clean doesn't
> remove config.h (should it?).
No, it should not. config.h is your own configuration and you should
know how to update it if config.def.h changes.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 17:09:36 +0100
Nick Warne wrote:
> I am not getting much luck here (do _I_ suck?) :(
>
> dwm and st work great so far and I am well impressed and happy; but
> any patches I apply either fail:
>
> http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1609/30448.html
>
> (I have since tried git vers
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 17:11:23 +0100
Nick Warne wrote:
> Hi Jochen,
>
> On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 17:47:04 +0200
> Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
>
> > Hi Nick,
> >
> > * Nick Warne [2016-09-24 12:50]:
> > > To reproduce, use st with just the scrollback patch applied.
> > >
> > > Start dwm, and then u
Hi Jochen,
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 17:47:04 +0200
Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> * Nick Warne [2016-09-24 12:50]:
> > To reproduce, use st with just the scrollback patch applied.
> >
> > Start dwm, and then use nano to load a large(ish) file (like dwm.c),
> > and use the PgDn key to scr
Hi Nick,
* Nick Warne [2016-09-24 12:50]:
> To reproduce, use st with just the scrollback patch applied.
>
> Start dwm, and then use nano to load a large(ish) file (like dwm.c),
> and use the PgDn key to scroll down - after about 10 seconds, X locks
> up - keyboard/mouse don't do anything.
I've
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 16:57:02 +0200
Martin Kühne wrote:
> You could just use a symbolic link in your $HOME or something instead
> of rebuilding dwm every time.
I don't. Once built, that's it - and as it happens, my own build of
xfce4-terminal works great.
> Just because this setup tends to make
You could just use a symbolic link in your $HOME or something instead
of rebuilding dwm every time.
Just because this setup tends to make you do it, doesn't mean you have
to solve every problem you have into it.
cheers!
mar77i
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016, stephen Turner wrote:
> What do you recommend for best knowledge of unsharing resources?
Start here:
OpenBSD: pledge(2), imsg_init(3)
Linux: unshare(2), prctl(2)
This is just some basic pointers to get you started. Nothing will ever
replace good architecture and careful des
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 09:40:38 -0400
Greg Reagle wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2016, at 09:33, Nick Warne wrote:
> > rebuilt dwm to use st.
>
> What does that mean?
>
I change config.h to use xfce4-terminal, so changed back to use st:
//static const char *termcmd[] = { "xfce4-terminal", NULL };
s
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016, at 09:33, Nick Warne wrote:
> rebuilt dwm to use st.
What does that mean?
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 08:55:53 -0400
Greg Reagle wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2016, at 07:50, Nick Warne wrote:
> > With latest git st and latest git scrollback patch, I had 3 X
> > crashes
>
> Does it happen with the latest unpatched st?
>
OK, just cleaned out st, a new git clone, rebuilt and ins
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016, at 07:50, Nick Warne wrote:
> With latest git st and latest git scrollback patch, I had 3 X crashes
Does it happen with the latest unpatched st?
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 14:02:20 +0200
Martin Kühne wrote:
> What does that script look like and what does your config.h look like?
> Sounds like you had firefox set to launch on said tag in the latter.
>
> cheers!
> mar77i
>
My script from $HOME:
./progs/firefox/firefox > /dev/null 2>&1 &
...bu
What does that script look like and what does your config.h look like?
Sounds like you had firefox set to launch on said tag in the latter.
cheers!
mar77i
Hi All,
With latest git st and latest git scrollback patch, I had 3 X crashes
this morning - X logs show too many attempts against something or
other (unfortunately Xorg.0.log gets over written). I haven't analysed
further, as I hate locking my lowly notebook up too often.
Rolling back to my cus
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 11:38:24 +0200
Uwe wrote:
> On 24 September 2016 10:05:58 CEST, Nick Warne
> wrote:
> >
> >I have a small script that lauches firefox thus:
> >
> >> ./ff
> >
> >but no matter what TAG I run it from, Firefox always opens in TAG 9.
> >Now, no problem with this, but I am cur
On 24 September 2016 10:05:58 CEST, Nick Warne wrote:
>
>I have a small script that lauches firefox thus:
>
>> ./ff
>
>but no matter what TAG I run it from, Firefox always opens in TAG 9.
>Now, no problem with this, but I am curious why only FF shows this
>behaviour?
>
>Nick
Check your config.h
---
Jo dawg, I heard you like presentations so I put a presentation after your
presentation so you can have infinite presentations.
sent.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sent.c b/sent.c
index fc319be..8580d0a 100644
--- a/sent.c
+++ b/sent.c
@@ -437,7 +437,
I have a small script that lauches firefox thus:
> ./ff
but no matter what TAG I run it from, Firefox always opens in TAG 9.
Now, no problem with this, but I am curious why only FF shows this
behaviour?
Nick
--
"Gosh that takes me back... or is it forward? That's the trouble with
time travel,
29 matches
Mail list logo
