On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 11:18:11AM +1100, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
> Go compiler/sdk is that c++ dependent (language and runtime) kludge which is
> gcc now (go is google and gcc becoming hard dependent on a c++98
> compiler/runtime is google mistake too), and rust compiler/sdk has similar
> issues.
Quoting Sylvain BERTRAND (2016-07-23 17:18:11)
> There is no "TinyGo" neither "TinyRust" and they are garbage collected in
> their
> basic profile. Language "theorists" should consider ML based languages too.
Rust is not garbage collected; one of the main features of Rust is its
automatic memory
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 02:52:10PM -0400, Donald Allen wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Cág wrote:
> >> Is there any need for a new language,
> >
> >
> > No
> >
> >> or is C good enough?
> >
> >
> > Yes
> >
> > There is Go already, if C is not enough.
>
> And Rust.
There is no "TinyGo"
small languages are useful, as a language in the language.
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Eric Pruitt wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 01:58:53PM -0400, Donald Allen wrote:
>> I am running dwm 6.1 on a FreeBSD 10.3 system. dwm I have applied the
>> pertag, better-borders, and status-colors patches.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Unfortunately, I am very busy right n
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 01:58:53PM -0400, Donald Allen wrote:
> I am running dwm 6.1 on a FreeBSD 10.3 system. dwm I have applied the
> pertag, better-borders, and status-colors patches.
>
> [...]
>
> Unfortunately, I am very busy right now and cannot devote time to
> trying to debug this. But if a
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Cág wrote:
>> Is there any need for a new language,
>
>
> No
>
>> or is C good enough?
>
>
> Yes
>
> There is Go already, if C is not enough.
And Rust.
My personal opinion: I've used Go a fair amount and while it has some
nice aspects, is well-documented and has
Is there any need for a new language,
No
or is C good enough?
Yes
There is Go already, if C is not enough.
I am running dwm 6.1 on a FreeBSD 10.3 system. dwm I have applied the
pertag, better-borders, and status-colors patches.
The (mis-)behavior I am observing is this: I have two windows, call
them A and B associated with Tag 1. I have selected monocle mode while
viewing Tag 1 and am viewing window B.
On 23.07.16 at 11:51am, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:54 PM, Britton Kerin wrote:
dwm needs patches to be good but the patches area is a mess and I
couln't get along with devs about fixing it, so I thought a pre-rolled
version of dwm might be useful instead:
You raise a go
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 13:54:36 -0800
Britton Kerin wrote:
Hey Britton,
> dwm needs patches to be good but the patches area is a mess and I
> couln't get along with devs about fixing it, so I thought a pre-rolled
> version of dwm might be useful instead:
you really raise a valid point, fortunately
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:54 PM, Britton Kerin wrote:
> dwm needs patches to be good but the patches area is a mess and I
> couln't get along with devs about fixing it, so I thought a pre-rolled
> version of dwm might be useful instead:
>
You raise a good point in my opinion: when someone upload
>Do *you* also need patches to be good?
Damn you suckless guys always know how to crack me up
2016-07-23 1:16 GMT+02:00 Quentin Carbonneaux :
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 01:54:36PM -0800, Britton Kerin wrote:
>> dwm needs patches to be good [...]
>
> Do *you* also need patches to be good?
>
>Do any one know of a C compiler that can out output snippets of
>machine code, for a wide range of CPU:s ? I'm primarily thinking of
>x86, x64, ARM, ARM-thumb.
As much as the suckless community doesn't like it for it's big size
and a lot unnecessary crap, GCC might be a good example for this.
Tak
14 matches
Mail list logo
