Re: [dev] is the multimon still useful?

2016-07-17 Thread FRIGN
On Sun, 17 Jul 2016 14:05:41 -0800 Britton Kerin wrote: > It looks like multi monitor support has been merged into mainline > anyway and this patch hasn't been updated in a while. I don't use > multi monitor setup so don't know about this stuff. Is this patch > still potentially useful or shoul

Re: [dev] [st] Latest git - Nano with syntax highlighting strange bug

2016-07-17 Thread hadrien . lacour
On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 03:41:07PM -0700, Eric Pruitt wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:30:45AM +0200, hadrien.lac...@openmailbox.org > wrote: > > The problem might be hard to reproduce, so here's a simpler one > > https://a.cocaine.ninja/jihcdl.gif > > I tried that, and it also didn't give my

Re: [dev] [st] Latest git - Nano with syntax highlighting strange bug

2016-07-17 Thread Eric Pruitt
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:30:45AM +0200, hadrien.lac...@openmailbox.org wrote: > The problem might be hard to reproduce, so here's a simpler one > https://a.cocaine.ninja/jihcdl.gif I tried that, and it also didn't give my any issues. I don't have any other ideas of what it could be; sorry. If yo

Re: [dev] [st] Latest git - Nano with syntax highlighting strange bug

2016-07-17 Thread hadrien . lacour
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:23:22AM +0200, hadrien.lac...@openmailbox.org wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:04:22AM +0200, hadrien.lac...@openmailbox.org > wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 02:22:00PM -0700, Eric Pruitt wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 10:45:10PM +0200, hadrien.lac...@openma

Re: [dev] [st] Latest git - Nano with syntax highlighting strange bug

2016-07-17 Thread hadrien . lacour
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:04:22AM +0200, hadrien.lac...@openmailbox.org wrote: > On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 02:22:00PM -0700, Eric Pruitt wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 10:45:10PM +0200, hadrien.lac...@openmailbox.org > > wrote: > > > I've recently changed from urxvt to st and noticed a bug when

[dev] is the multimon still useful?

2016-07-17 Thread Britton Kerin
It looks like multi monitor support has been merged into mainline anyway and this patch hasn't been updated in a while. I don't use multi monitor setup so don't know about this stuff. Is this patch still potentially useful or should it go away? Britton

[dev] what to do with patches like exresize dwm-r1606-exresize.diff

2016-07-17 Thread Britton Kerin
It sounds like it does something good, but it build fails when applied to commits from the date given on its wiki page, which is my best guess as to what version it's targeting. dwm-r1615-mpdcontrol.diff is another example, there are others I'd consider taking these off the public page until some

Re: [dev] [st] Latest git - Nano with syntax highlighting strange bug

2016-07-17 Thread hadrien . lacour
On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 02:22:00PM -0700, Eric Pruitt wrote: > On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 10:45:10PM +0200, hadrien.lac...@openmailbox.org > wrote: > > I've recently changed from urxvt to st and noticed a bug when using nano > > which will be easier to describe with a short gif: > > https://a.cocaine

Re: [dev] [st] Latest git - Nano with syntax highlighting strange bug

2016-07-17 Thread Eric Pruitt
On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 10:45:10PM +0200, hadrien.lac...@openmailbox.org wrote: > I've recently changed from urxvt to st and noticed a bug when using nano > which will be easier to describe with a short gif: > https://a.cocaine.ninja/xtlajf.gif > This issue happens ONLY when I change "static unsign

[dev] [st] Latest git - Nano with syntax highlighting strange bug

2016-07-17 Thread hadrien . lacour
Hello, I've recently changed from urxvt to st and noticed a bug when using nano which will be easier to describe with a short gif: https://a.cocaine.ninja/xtlajf.gif This issue happens ONLY when I change "static unsigned int tabspaces" from 8 to 4 in the config file.