On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 01:54:13PM -0800, Britton Kerin wrote:
> I'm not going to try to fix patches I don't use myself, it's possible
> to screw up and testing is a hassle since it involves the wm.
I wonder what the odds are of a patch applying cleanly, compilation of
of dwm succeeding but actual
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:38 PM, FRIGN wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 10:01:43 -0800
> Britton Kerin wrote:
>
>>
>
> the right format is
>
> --.diff
So there are three categories of problematic patches:
1. Patches that don't follow the naming convention
2. Patches that don't apply cleanly
