Greetings.
On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 07:11:49 +0200 Alex Pilon wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 02:28:14AM +0300, Cág wrote:
> > Of course, tis just me. I'm sure Arch/Manjaro users
> > will find it useful.
>
> Uuuum, systemd does process ACPI events…
acpid does process ACPI events for me. Acpid didn’
Greetings.
On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 07:12:43 +0200 Thomas Oltmann
wrote:
> Hey everybody,
>
> I just started tinkering with dwm a couple of weeks ago. And I
> especially love how customisable and extensible it is. No weird 'writing
> Javascript Applets' or 'hooking into' other functions or fiddlin
If you don't want to use Lua, what about doing something more like CGI? Then
you can just call the configuration program with what you want a dynamic answer
for. You could then have a simple awk script parse your config file and answer
queries to the host program.
I suggest this because I have
C JIT->have a look at tinycc from F. Bellard.
llvm is c++ then, by definition is not suckless and a massive brain damaged
kludged.
cheers,
--
Sylvain
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 02:28:14AM +0300, Cág wrote:
> Of course, tis just me. I'm sure Arch/Manjaro users
> will find it useful.
Uuuum, systemd does process ACPI events…
Hi there,
Judging from my experience: I don't use a display
manager, nor dbus, systemd, consolekit etc. I'm
not sure if these things are popular here
(well, systemd at least, as the vast majority here uses
OpenBSD, right?). Also I treat my tty sessions as usual
sessions, i.e. I need X11 only to su
There's several examples of P-code/Pascal VMs around [0][1][2][3].
Some more detailed than others.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-code_machine#Example_machine
[1] http://www.icodeguru.com/vc/10book/books/book4/secg.htm
[2] http://blackmesatech.com/2011/12/pl0/pl0.xhtml
[3] https://github.com
On Sun, 19 Jun 2016, Thomas Oltmann wrote:
> So, what do you think? Do you even feel there's a need for a
> shutdown-menu for dwm? Are you happy with the quality of the source code?
What does it do that dmenu + a shell script can't?
Hey everybody,
I just started tinkering with dwm a couple of weeks ago. And I
especially love how customisable and extensible it is. No weird 'writing
Javascript Applets' or 'hooking into' other functions or fiddling with
cryptic XML files - it's just C code.
However, I really missed being a
On Sat, 18 Jun 2016, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering if others had an opinion on JIT. Suppose we don't need
> anything fancy like adaptive optimisation, but just wanted to compile
> a program at runtime. One possibility might be to generate C code and
> store that in a file
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 10:33:23AM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering if others had an opinion on JIT. Suppose we don't need
> anything fancy like adaptive optimisation, but just wanted to compile
> a program at runtime.
Why?
Hi all,
I was wondering if others had an opinion on JIT. Suppose we don't need
anything fancy like adaptive optimisation, but just wanted to compile
a program at runtime. One possibility might be to generate C code and
store that in a file and then call the C compiler and then execute the
resultin
Hi all,
Following this past conversation, I decided to reinstate rune validity
checks in libutf. Since people seem to be using my repo as a
submodule, I decided it was best to cater for that (somewhat
questionable) use case.
> I would have liked to have separated UTF-8 and Unicode support into tw
13 matches
Mail list logo
