Some patches show up on the patches page like e.g.:
dwm-6.1-dwmfifo.diff (6.9k) (29.01.2014)
dwm-6.1-save_floats.diff (1605b) (20140209)
The -6.1- substring seems to imply that these patches are intended to
apply cleanly to version 6.1, but the date strings that are appended
suggest that maybe th
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Stephen Paul Weber
wrote:
>> I'm wondering if there's a way to easily synthesize an X click event and
>> others?
>
> Maybe look into how xdotool does it?
Looks like just using xdotool will work great, thx
Britton
> I'm wondering if there's a way to easily synthesize an X click event and
> others?
Maybe look into how xdotool does it?
I like swarp I'm wondering if there's a way to easily synthesize an X
click event and others?
google seems to be confused by javascript searchers on this one
Britton
Well, there are of course still operations that
are cheaper. Such is the case for the code you
posted. Operations such as XOR, AND and OR
should be hard to beat. NEQ is however...
But branching is definitely cheaper than it
used to be. Perhaps “incredibly” is stretching it.
However,
for (i =
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:32:11PM +0200, Mattias Andrée wrote:
> Proofreading and suggestions is greatly appreciated!
>
Page 5: "Branches are incredibly cheap on modern CPUs." Not so! I wrote
a variety of CRC32 algorithms to benchmark (which will just measure my
personal CPU, I know, but it's be
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 20:11:07 +0200
Eivind Askeland wrote:
> On 14/06/16 14:11, Mattias Andrée wrote:
> > Attached is an updated version.
> > Pages 10, 17, and 21 have been updated.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 23:32:11 +0200
> > Mattias Andrée wrote:
> >
> >> Ahoy comrades!
> >>
> >> I have
On 14/06/16 14:11, Mattias Andrée wrote:
Attached is an updated version.
Pages 10, 17, and 21 have been updated.
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 23:32:11 +0200
Mattias Andrée wrote:
Ahoy comrades!
I have written a paper about libzahl.
Too energy efficient to open the PDF and
read the abstract? No worr
