On 16 May 2016 at 23:22, Marc André Tanner wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 01:27:40PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
>> I think the vis editor alone is enough bloat in the suckless
>> repositories.
>
> I don't know what vis has to do with the original thread, nonetheless
> it would be interesting to know wh
> I'm not sure my other "factual error(s?)" was, but I would be happy to
> be enlightened.
Yeah, I wrote in a hurry. After sending it I thought it could have been
worded better. The issues I noticed and was responding to were:
1. Uncertainty around whether .xinitrc would be recognised on session
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:45:19AM +1000, Timothy Rice wrote:
> There seems to be some confusion around xsessions etc, resulting in some
> factual errors in one or two recent emails. The following might be useful:
> [...]
> I can't speak one way or the other for the .xsession file, but it is not
>
Dear all,
There seems to be some confusion around xsessions etc, resulting in some
factual errors in one or two recent emails. The following might be useful:
http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/47359/what-is-xsession-for
To summarise, .xsession is used as a custom script when starting X from
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 03:00:16PM -0800, Britton Kerin wrote:
> I just made .xinit:
>
> $ ls -l .xinitrc
> -rw-r--r-- 1 bkerin bkerin 9 May 16 14:50 .xinitrc
> $ cat .xinitrc
> exec dwm
> $
>
> I slightly remember doing that 20 years ago or so, fun. But it doesn't
> seem to work nowadays at least
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Eric Pruitt wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 02:05:58PM -0800, Britton Kerin wrote:
>> Is it possible to run dwm and keep my desktop icons somehow? I have
>> most of my projects sort of geographically organized there which sucks
>> I know but I'd rather not lose i
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 09:51:08PM +0200, Jan Christoph Ebersbach wrote:
> > On the system I'm using that relies on PAM, my account doesn't have an
> > entry in the local /etc/passwd file. Disabling getpw and related bits
> > makes the patch work for me.
>
> I fixed the issue and moved the getpw co
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:38:00PM +0200, Jan Christoph Ebersbach wrote:
> On Mon 16-05-2016 11:54 -0700, Eric Pruitt wrote:
> > Since PAM configurations typically enforce a delay before you can
> > reauthenticate after an incorrect password is entered, it would be
> > nice if there was another col
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 02:05:58PM -0800, Britton Kerin wrote:
> Is it possible to run dwm and keep my desktop icons somehow? I have
> most of my projects sort of geographically organized there which sucks
> I know but I'd rather not lose it right now. I found lots of ancient
> pages about this I
I just replaced ancient laptop yes I hate gnome3 too now but having
lots of other shit to do and already behind from this "upgrade" I
can't afford break my whole system lose desktop icons etc all at once
Is it possible to run dwm and keep my desktop icons somehow? I have
most of my projects sort
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 11:07:47PM -0800, M Farkas-Dyck wrote:
> tty sucks but ain't about to die soon...
The same applies to curses. The NetBSD curses library[1] was recently
ported to Linux. I haven't yet tried it out myself, but the code looks
much cleaner than ncurses. This might be interestin
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 01:27:40PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
> I think the vis editor alone is enough bloat in the suckless
> repositories.
I don't know what vis has to do with the original thread, nonetheless
it would be interesting to know which aspects of vis you consider
bloated?
--
Marc André Ta
On Mon 16-05-2016 11:54 -0700, Eric Pruitt wrote:
> I have a suggestion -- I think you should add another color option to
> the configuration. Since PAM configurations typically enforce a delay
> before you can reauthenticate after an incorrect password is entered,
> it would be nice if there was
On Mon 16-05-2016 11:47 -0700, Eric Pruitt wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 08:07:54PM +0200, Jan Christoph Ebersbach
> wrote:
> > I guess this issue can still happen. I didn't remove most of the
> > getpw* code in order to keep the patch small. I'm using sssd and so
> > the getpw calls still wo
Eric Pruitt wrote:
> I think you should add another color option to the configuration.
Heyho,
if you add that to the patch be sure to also run `sed -i s/slock/nyanlock/` on
all files before submitting the new version.
--Markus
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 11:47:38AM -0700, Eric Pruitt wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 08:07:54PM +0200, Jan Christoph Ebersbach wrote:
> > I guess this issue can still happen. I didn't remove most of the getpw*
> > code in order to keep the patch small. I'm using sssd and so the getpw
> > calls
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 08:07:54PM +0200, Jan Christoph Ebersbach wrote:
> I guess this issue can still happen. I didn't remove most of the getpw*
> code in order to keep the patch small. I'm using sssd and so the getpw
> calls still work. The only issue is that the password hash can't be
> retr
Hi Eric,
On Mon 16-05-2016 10:05 -0700, Eric Pruitt wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 06:32:54PM +0200, Jan Christoph Ebersbach
> wrote:
> > Yes, it's there in git but it takes a while till the web pages have
> > be regenerated, I guess.
>
> I could be wrong, but I'm fairly certain the website is
On Mon, 16 May 2016 17:21:01 +0200
Jan Christoph Ebersbach wrote:
Hey Jan,
> I've added support for PAM authentication to slock. When you try it,
> I'd very happy about feedback because I haven't really done any serious
> work with PAM yet:
>
> http://tools.suckless.org/slock/patches/pam_auth
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 06:32:54PM +0200, Jan Christoph Ebersbach wrote:
> Yes, it's there in git but it takes a while till the web pages have be
> regenerated, I guess.
I could be wrong, but I'm fairly certain the website is manually
regenerated. Otherwise, it would be pretty easy to do malicious
Yes, it's there in git but it takes a while till the web pages have be
regenerated, I guess.
On Mon 16-05-2016 09:06 -0700, Eric Pruitt wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 05:21:01PM +0200, Jan Christoph Ebersbach
> wrote:
> > I've added support for PAM authentication to slock. When you try
> > it,
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 05:59:37PM +0200, Kamil Cholewiński wrote:
> On Mon, 16 May 2016, Jan Christoph Ebersbach wrote:
> > What auth system are you using if it's neither PAM nor shadow/passwd?
>
> Kumbaya auth, or cowboy auth, according to personal preference
I vote for Stallman auth -- passwor
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 05:21:01PM +0200, Jan Christoph Ebersbach wrote:
> I've added support for PAM authentication to slock. When you try it,
> I'd very happy about feedback because I haven't really done any serious
> work with PAM yet:
>
> http://tools.suckless.org/slock/patches/pam_auth
When
On Mon, 16 May 2016, Jan Christoph Ebersbach wrote:
> What auth system are you using if it's neither PAM nor shadow/passwd?
Kumbaya auth, or cowboy auth, according to personal preference
What auth system are you using if it's neither PAM nor shadow/passwd?
On Mon 16-05-2016 17:38 +0200, hiro wrote:
> bad idea, just like the existing bullshit for auth in slock.
>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
bad idea, just like the existing bullshit for auth in slock.
Hi,
I've added support for PAM authentication to slock. When you try it,
I'd very happy about feedback because I haven't really done any serious
work with PAM yet:
http://tools.suckless.org/slock/patches/pam_auth
Cheers,
Jan Christoph
--
Jan Christoph Ebersbach
I didn’t want some petty, inferi
On 2016-05-16 08:07, M Farkas-Dyck wrote:
Hi, i forked termbox [0] at an earlier version before much stupidity
[1, 2].
Would suckless community be interested to adopt this repo? tty sucks
but ain't about to die soon...
[0] https://github.com/strake/termbox.c
[1]
https://github.com/nsf/termbox/
Hi, i forked termbox [0] at an earlier version before much stupidity [1, 2].
Would suckless community be interested to adopt this repo? tty sucks
but ain't about to die soon...
[0] https://github.com/strake/termbox.c
[1]
https://github.com/nsf/termbox/commit/e1186c771347c396e47c33a570ffc38642226
29 matches
Mail list logo