Re: [dev] structural regular expression support for vis

2016-05-05 Thread Marc André Tanner
Hi all, While there are still some bugs left, I'm quite happy how structural regexp support for vis is progressing. Known issues include: - relative line specifiers are in some cases wrongly interpreted, as a consequence -0+,+0- rounds dot up instead of down to whole lines - s (substitut

Re: [dev] structural regular expression support for vis

2016-05-05 Thread Marc André Tanner
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 01:07:10PM -0500, Joshua Haase wrote: > - When using sam commands, calling undo once does not restore the > previous state. > > One can restore previous state by calling undo several times, but > expected behavior is to call it once, as it is logically one > operati